We see the same style, technique's and scenario's played out with each Nation they infiltrate happen again and again throughout World History as they Infiltrated, Divide and Conquer. The only difference are the name's in which they refer to themselves.
Hos 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of (Truth) knowledge: because thou hast rejected (Truth) knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I (YAHWEH) will also forget thy children.
Order through Chaos. Creating Confusion (Babylon) with Change and Social Engineering.
The Hegelian process of change in which a concept or its realization
passes over into and is preserved and fulfilled by its opposite...
development through the stages of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis in accordance with the laws of dialectical materialism ....
Any systematic reasoning, exposition, or argument that juxtaposes opposed or
contradictory ideas and usually seeks to resolve their conflict ...
The dialectical tension or opposition between two interacting forces or elements."
"Dialectical Materialism ...
"Dialectical Materialism ...
The Marxist theory that maintains the material basis of a reality constantly changing in a dialectical process and the priority of matter over mind."
Reply
What is the Hegelian Dialectic?
|
Introduction: Why study Hegel?
"...the State 'has
the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member
of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special
privileges.'" Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144)
In 1847 the London
Communist League (Karl Marx and Frederick Engels) used Hegel's theory of the dialectic to back up their economic theory of communism.
Now, in the 21st century, Hegelian-Marxist thinking affects our entire social
and political structure. The Hegelian dialectic is the framework for guiding our thoughts and
actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution. If we do not
understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the world, then
we do not know how we are helping to implement the vision. When we remain locked into dialectical thinking,
we cannot see out of the box.
Hegel's dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels' grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship of the proletariat. The synthetic Hegelian solution to all these conflicts can't be introduced unless we all take a side that will advance the agenda. The Marxist's global agenda is moving along at breakneck speed. The only way to completely stop the privacy invasions, expanding domestic police powers, land grabs, insane wars against inanimate objects (and transient verbs), covert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, is to step outside the dialectic. This releases us from the limitations of controlled and guided thought.
When we understand what motivated Hegel, we can see his influence on all of our destinies. ... Hegelian conflicts steer every political arena on the planet, from the United Nations to the major American political parties, all the way down to local school boards and community councils. Dialogues and consensus-building are primary tools of the dialectic, and terror and intimidation are also acceptable formats for obtaining the goal. The ultimate Third Way agenda is world government. Once we get what's really going on, we can cut the strings and move our lives in original directions outside the confines of the dialectical madness. Focusing on Hegel's and Engel's ultimate agenda, and avoiding getting caught up in their impenetrable theories of social evolution, gives us the opportunity to think and act our way toward freedom, justice, and genuine liberty for all.
Today the dialectic is active in every political issue that encourages taking sides. We can see it in environmentalists instigating conflicts against private property owners, in democrats against republicans, in greens against libertarians, in communists against socialists, in neo-cons against traditional conservatives, in community activists against individuals, in pro-choice versus pro-life, in Christians against Muslims, in isolationists versus interventionists, in peace activists against war hawks. No matter what the issue, the invisible dialectic aims to control both the conflict and the resolution of differences, and leads everyone involved into a new cycle of conflicts.
.jpg)
We're definitely not in Kansas anymore.
For a visual concept, see this simple chart [page now deleted] of the Hegelian Dialectic and Marx's Dialectical Materialism, posted by the Calverton Private School.
Hegel's dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels' grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship of the proletariat. The synthetic Hegelian solution to all these conflicts can't be introduced unless we all take a side that will advance the agenda. The Marxist's global agenda is moving along at breakneck speed. The only way to completely stop the privacy invasions, expanding domestic police powers, land grabs, insane wars against inanimate objects (and transient verbs), covert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, is to step outside the dialectic. This releases us from the limitations of controlled and guided thought.
When we understand what motivated Hegel, we can see his influence on all of our destinies. ... Hegelian conflicts steer every political arena on the planet, from the United Nations to the major American political parties, all the way down to local school boards and community councils. Dialogues and consensus-building are primary tools of the dialectic, and terror and intimidation are also acceptable formats for obtaining the goal. The ultimate Third Way agenda is world government. Once we get what's really going on, we can cut the strings and move our lives in original directions outside the confines of the dialectical madness. Focusing on Hegel's and Engel's ultimate agenda, and avoiding getting caught up in their impenetrable theories of social evolution, gives us the opportunity to think and act our way toward freedom, justice, and genuine liberty for all.
Today the dialectic is active in every political issue that encourages taking sides. We can see it in environmentalists instigating conflicts against private property owners, in democrats against republicans, in greens against libertarians, in communists against socialists, in neo-cons against traditional conservatives, in community activists against individuals, in pro-choice versus pro-life, in Christians against Muslims, in isolationists versus interventionists, in peace activists against war hawks. No matter what the issue, the invisible dialectic aims to control both the conflict and the resolution of differences, and leads everyone involved into a new cycle of conflicts.
For a visual concept, see this simple chart [page now deleted] of the Hegelian Dialectic and Marx's Dialectical Materialism, posted by the Calverton Private School.
Definitions:
Merriam-Webster:
"Dialectic ....the Hegelian process of change in which a
concept or its realization passes over into and is preserved and fulfilled by
its opposite...
development through the stages of thesis, antithesis, and
synthesis in accordance with the laws of dialectical materialism ...
.any
systematic reasoning, exposition, or argument that juxtaposes opposed or
contradictory ideas and usually seeks to resolve their conflict ...
....the dialectical tension or opposition between two interacting forces or elements."
"Dialectical Materialism ... the Marxist theory that maintains the material basis of a reality constantly changing in a dialectical process and the priority of matter over mind."
"Hegel's dialectic
often appears broken up for convenience into three moments called
"thesis" (in the French historical example, the revolution),
"antithesis" (the terror which followed), and "synthesis"
(the constitutional state of free citizens). ... Much Hegel scholarship does
not recognize the usefulness of this triadic classification for
shedding light on Hegel's thought.
Although Hegel refers to "the two
elemental considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final
aim; secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of
knowledge and will, with its life, movement, and activity" (thesis and
antithesis) he doesn't use
"synthesis" but instead speaks of the "Whole": "We then recognised the State as the
moral Whole and the Reality of Freedom, and consequently as the objective unity
of these two elements." ...
"Hegel used this system of dialectics to explain the whole of the history of philosophy, science, art, politics and religion, but many modern critics point out that Hegel often seems to gloss over the realities of history in order to fit it into his dialectical mold....
In the 20th century, Hegel's philosophy underwent a major renaissance. This was due partly to the rediscovery and reevaluation of him as the philosophical progenitor of Marxism by philosophically oriented Marxists, partly through a resurgence of the historical perspective that Hegel brought to everything, and partly through increasing recognition of the importance of his dialectical method. The book that did the most to reintroduce Hegel into the Marxist canon was perhaps Georg Lukacs's History and Class Consciousness. This sparked a renewed interest in Hegel reflected in the work of Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Ernst Bloch....
"Hegel used this system of dialectics to explain the whole of the history of philosophy, science, art, politics and religion, but many modern critics point out that Hegel often seems to gloss over the realities of history in order to fit it into his dialectical mold....
In the 20th century, Hegel's philosophy underwent a major renaissance. This was due partly to the rediscovery and reevaluation of him as the philosophical progenitor of Marxism by philosophically oriented Marxists, partly through a resurgence of the historical perspective that Hegel brought to everything, and partly through increasing recognition of the importance of his dialectical method. The book that did the most to reintroduce Hegel into the Marxist canon was perhaps Georg Lukacs's History and Class Consciousness. This sparked a renewed interest in Hegel reflected in the work of Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Ernst Bloch....
"Beginning in the
1960's, Anglo-American Hegel scholarship has attempted to challenge the traditional
interpretation of Hegel as offering a metaphysical system." See Popular Occultism
The Hegelian dialectical formula: A (thesis) versus B (anti-thesis) equals C (synthesis).
For example: If (A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of freedom then (C) neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a slave.
The Soviet Union was based on the Hegelian dialectic, as is all Marxist writing. The Soviets didn't give up their Hegelian reasoning when they supposedly stopped being a communist country. They merely changed the dialectical language to fit into the modern version of Marxist thinking called communitarianism. American author Steve Montgomery explores Moscow's adept use of the Hegelian dialectic in Glasnost-Perestroika: A Model Potemkin Village.
For example: If (A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of freedom then (C) neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a slave.
The Soviet Union was based on the Hegelian dialectic, as is all Marxist writing. The Soviets didn't give up their Hegelian reasoning when they supposedly stopped being a communist country. They merely changed the dialectical language to fit into the modern version of Marxist thinking called communitarianism. American author Steve Montgomery explores Moscow's adept use of the Hegelian dialectic in Glasnost-Perestroika: A Model Potemkin Village.
How is it possible to consider a Hegelian argument?
Hegel is an imperialist con artist who established the
principles of dialectical "no-reason." Hegel's dialectic has
allowed globalists to lead simple, capable, freeborn men and women back into the superstitious, racist and unreasonable age of imperial global dominance. National governments represent people who are free from imperial controls over private property, trade and production. National governments protect their workers from imperial slavery by protecting the worker's markets. But if you use Hegel's logical Marxism, the only way to protect people from slavery is to become the slave trader, just for a while. Twisted logic is why cons are so successful, and Hegel twisted it in such a way as to be "impenetrable." Like Hegel and Marx, the best street con knows his spiel has to use logic to bend and distort the story, and good cons weave their lies on logical mathematical progression. The fallacy is in the language, not in the math. Detective Phillip Worts' 2001 article
Communist Oriented Policing is a nice explanation of Dialectical Materialism's
influence on America.
The communitarian purpose for the Hegelian dialectic
Hegel's theory is
basically that mankind is merely a series of constant philosophical conflicts.
Hegel was an idealist who believed that the highest state of mankind can only be
attained through constant ideological conflict and resolution. The rules of the
dialectic means mankind can only reach its highest spiritual consciousness
through endless self-perpetuating struggle between ideals, and the eventual
synthesizing of all opposites. Hegel's dialectic taught all conflict takes man
to the next spiritual level. But in the final analysis, this ideology simply
justifies conflict and endless war. It is also the reasoning behind using
military power to export an illogical version of freedom and false democratic ideals.
The reason we can call it the justification for modern conflicts and war, with impunity, is because no one can prove Hegel's theory is true. No matter how many new words they make up to define it, or how many new theories they come up with to give it validity, we can prove beyond a doubt that it is all false. And, we can show the final equation in Hegels' Dialectic is:
A: The [your nation goes here] System of Political Economy (List 1841)
B: state controlled world communism
C: state controlled global communitarianism.
The Hegelian dialectic is the ridiculous idea that constant conflict and continual merging of opposite ideologies, as established by extreme right or left belief systems, will lead spiritual mankind into final perfection.
The reason we can call it the justification for modern conflicts and war, with impunity, is because no one can prove Hegel's theory is true. No matter how many new words they make up to define it, or how many new theories they come up with to give it validity, we can prove beyond a doubt that it is all false. And, we can show the final equation in Hegels' Dialectic is:
A: The [your nation goes here] System of Political Economy (List 1841)
B: state controlled world communism
C: state controlled global communitarianism.
The Hegelian dialectic is the ridiculous idea that constant conflict and continual merging of opposite ideologies, as established by extreme right or left belief systems, will lead spiritual mankind into final perfection.
(Americans understood man's spiritual quests to be outside the realm of
government control).
keeps trying it over and over
expecting different results. ...
When Frederick Engels and Karl Marx based their communist theory on Hegel's theory of spiritual advancement via constant resolution of differences, they based the theory of communism on an unproven theory.
While Darwin's theory of evolution is still being debated, there's absolutely no proof that societies are continually evolving.
When Frederick Engels and Karl Marx based their communist theory on Hegel's theory of spiritual advancement via constant resolution of differences, they based the theory of communism on an unproven theory.
While Darwin's theory of evolution is still being debated, there's absolutely no proof that societies are continually evolving.
When Engels and Marx later
based their communist theory on Lewis Henry Morgan's theory of
anthropology in 1877, they again based the theory of communism on an unprovable theory.
And when Amitai Etzioni used Hegelian reasoning to base the Communitarian Network on a "balance" between (A) Rights and (B) Responsibilities, he built the entire theory of (C) communitarianism on nothing but disproven and unprovable unscientific theories....
Already gaining substantial ground against the Americans, British Marxism was bolstered when Charles Darwin published his theory of human evolution in 1859. Engels, according to modern day scholars, seized upon Darwin's theory to substantiate communism:
anthropology in 1877, they again based the theory of communism on an unprovable theory.
And when Amitai Etzioni used Hegelian reasoning to base the Communitarian Network on a "balance" between (A) Rights and (B) Responsibilities, he built the entire theory of (C) communitarianism on nothing but disproven and unprovable unscientific theories....
Already gaining substantial ground against the Americans, British Marxism was bolstered when Charles Darwin published his theory of human evolution in 1859. Engels, according to modern day scholars, seized upon Darwin's theory to substantiate communism:
"When Marx read The
Origin of Species he wrote to Engels that, 'although it is developed in the
crude English style, this is the book which contains the basis in natural
history for our view.'
They turned against what they saw as the social, as opposed to the biological, implications of Darwinism when they realised that it contained no support for their shibboleth of class oppression.
Since they were slippery customers rather than scientists, they were not likely to relinquish their views just because something did not fit." (see: Marxism and Darwinism by Anton Pannekoek, 1912.)
They turned against what they saw as the social, as opposed to the biological, implications of Darwinism when they realised that it contained no support for their shibboleth of class oppression.
Since they were slippery customers rather than scientists, they were not likely to relinquish their views just because something did not fit." (see: Marxism and Darwinism by Anton Pannekoek, 1912.)
In 1877 Lewis Henry
Morgan published Ancient Society, or Researches in Life, Lines of Human
Progress from Savagery, through Barbarism, to Civilization. Then the
"slippery" Engels seized upon Morgan's work as the constantly
"evolving" basis for the totally unsubstantiated theory of natural
social evolution into utopian world communism....
Hegel's formula has been so successful that in 2003 all U.S. domestic and foreign policy is dominated by "communitarian thinking," the whole country is living under the new laws, and yet Americans most affected by "impenetrable" Hegelian laws have never once heard the term used.
Hegel's formula has been so successful that in 2003 all U.S. domestic and foreign policy is dominated by "communitarian thinking," the whole country is living under the new laws, and yet Americans most affected by "impenetrable" Hegelian laws have never once heard the term used.
Conclusion:
The Hegelian dialectic
presupposes the factual basis for the theory of social evolutionary principles,
which coincidentally backed up Marx. Marx's Darwinian theory of the
"social evolution of the species," (even though it has been used for
a century to create a vast new scientific community, including eugenics and
socio-economics), does not adhere to the basis for all good scientific
research, and appears to exist mainly to advance itself, and all its
sub-socio-scientific arms, as the more moral human science. To the ACL this
means the entire basis for the communitarian solution is based on a false
premise, because there is no FACTUAL basis that "social evolution of the
species" exists, based as it is only on Darwinian and Marxist ideology of
man's "natural" evolution towards a British version of utopia.
The London-Marxist platform in 1847 was "to abolish private property." The American Revolution was based in private property rights. Marxist societies confiscate wealth and promise to "re-distribute it equally." America promised everyone they could keep and control what was the product of their own labor. Modern Marxist adherents openly claim they will "rebuild the world," and they train activist "change agents" to openly support overthrowing the legitimate governments of the world. Since their inception, Marxist agent provocateurs can be linked to every anarchist assassination and student uprising that caused chaos to the established European civilization throughout the 18th and 19th centuries.
Modern Americans
have succumbed to the conspiracy theory label and will only listen to what the
propaganda machines tell them. Now our people don't believe anyone other than
maybe the Arab world "hates our freedom." Most modern Americans will
never know what went wrong with their "great experiment in
democracy."
While the Marxist-communitarian argument has not provided a shred of evidence to prove their utopian vision, and their synthesis does not match their own projected conclusions of world justice, we are convinced their argument does in fact substantiate our conclusion, that the entire philosophical dialectical argument is nothing but a brilliant ruse.
While the Marxist-communitarian argument has not provided a shred of evidence to prove their utopian vision, and their synthesis does not match their own projected conclusions of world justice, we are convinced their argument does in fact substantiate our conclusion, that the entire philosophical dialectical argument is nothing but a brilliant ruse.
We used to call it "a cheap
parlor trick" until a responder to this page wondered how we could call it
"cheap" when it's been so successful. And he was right.
The dialectical arguments for human rights, social equity, and world peace and justice are a perfectly designed diversion in the defeated British Empire's Hegelian-Fabian-Metaphysical-Theosophical Monopoly game.
It's the most successful con job in the history of the modern world. (For a well presented Christian overview of the con, see American Babylon: Part Five-the Triumph of the Merchants by Peter Goodgame.)
The communitarian synthesis is the final silent move in a well-designed, quietly implemented plot to re-make the world into colonies.
To us it doesn't matter if there is some form of ancient religion that propels the plotters, nor does it really matter if it turns out they're aliens (as some suggest).
The bottom line is the Hegelian dialectic sets up the scene for state intervention, confiscation, and redistribution in the U.S., and this is against our ENTIRE constitutional based society.
The Hegelian dialectic is not a conspiracy theory because the Conspiracy Theory is a fraud. We've all been duped by global elitists who plan to take totalitarian control of all nation's people, property, and produce.
Communitarian Plans exist in every corner of the world, and nobody at the local level will explain why there's no national legal avenue to withdraw from the U.N.'s "community" development plans.
The dialectical arguments for human rights, social equity, and world peace and justice are a perfectly designed diversion in the defeated British Empire's Hegelian-Fabian-Metaphysical-Theosophical Monopoly game.
It's the most successful con job in the history of the modern world. (For a well presented Christian overview of the con, see American Babylon: Part Five-the Triumph of the Merchants by Peter Goodgame.)
The communitarian synthesis is the final silent move in a well-designed, quietly implemented plot to re-make the world into colonies.
To us it doesn't matter if there is some form of ancient religion that propels the plotters, nor does it really matter if it turns out they're aliens (as some suggest).
The bottom line is the Hegelian dialectic sets up the scene for state intervention, confiscation, and redistribution in the U.S., and this is against our ENTIRE constitutional based society.
The Hegelian dialectic is not a conspiracy theory because the Conspiracy Theory is a fraud. We've all been duped by global elitists who plan to take totalitarian control of all nation's people, property, and produce.
Communitarian Plans exist in every corner of the world, and nobody at the local level will explain why there's no national legal avenue to withdraw from the U.N.'s "community" development plans.
Appendix:
Everything changes, and
Dialectics for Kids explains how. If you are old enough to read, you can
understand change. It's so simple even grown-ups can understand.
Please choose:
·
The ABC's of Change -
Ages 4 and up
·
Popcorn, Earthquakes,
and Other Changes - Ages 5 and up
·
Bit by Bit . . . Then
all at Once - Ages 7 and up
·
Ten Ways You Turn into Your Opposite - Ages 9 and up [Emphasis added]
The Fabian Society of Australia explains the Hegelian-Marxist Third Way
synthesis. "Re-inventing Collectivism: The new Social Democracy" by
Mark Latham, Member for Werriwa Third Way Conference, Centre for Applied
Economic Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 12 July 2001:
"Over the past
decade, a group of social democrats have moved down the reinvention path. They
have developed a distinctive political project, exploring the new institutions
and forums of a collective society. In the United States, Bill Clinton called
it the Third Way. In Britain, Tony Blair has made it the work of New
Labour."
Quotes that validate the ACL thesis that communitarians IS the
synthesis in the Hegelian dialectic:
"People are living
in a snarled-up subset of Marx's thinking, and do not know it. They twist logic
to get to conclusions that will suit the current prejudices. They garnish it
with a little Christianity or mysticism or whatever, though these play no
important part in their world outlook." TRUTH OVERLOOKED: THE LEGACY OF LIST by Gwydion M. Williams (also available via Cal
State LA-POLS 426 online reading list.)
"The Socialist
Alliance programme is the foundation upon which everything else is built,
including in time our exact organisational forms and constantly shifting tactics.
The programme links our continuous and what
should be all-encompassing
agitational work with our ultimate aim of a communitarian, or communist, system.
Our programme thus establishes the basis for
agreed action and is the lodestar, the point of reference, around which the
voluntary unity of the Socialist Alliance is built and concretised. Put another
way, the programme represents the dialectical unity between theory and
practice." [emphasis added]
"The market
economics of the Right and the government bureaucracies of the Left have
weakened society's connectedness. They have not been effective forums for
collective action. For Right-wing politics, this is not much of an issue. It
has always believed in the supremacy of individual freedom and individual
action. For the Left, however, it is a huge problem.
"The old ideologies positioned politics as
a struggle for ownership, the historic battle between socialism and capitalism. The capitalism and Marxist socialism. Third Way, by contrast, sees politics as an exercise in communitarianism:rebuilding the relationships and social
capital between people. It aims to put the social back into social justice.
This is an important strategy for combating individualism and generating a sense of collective responsibility
in society."
Australian Fabian Society, "Re-inventing Collectivism: The new Social Democracy" by Mark Latham, Member for Werriwa Third Way Conference, Centre for Applied Economic Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 12 July 2001
"In a passage that
is notable for its vagueness, Azevedo says that the CEBs should be the basis
for a new communitarianism that rejects the two "bankrupt" models and
systems "that are now polarizing the world," This communitarianism is to be "a dialectical synthesis, a new
creation, superimposing itself on thesis and antithesis rather than retrieving
them." The passage illustrates the controversy in Latin American
Catholicism between those who continue to endorse the "third-position-ism"
(tercerismo) of Catholic social teaching and those (including all liberation
theologians that I know of) who believe that only socialism can be in accord
with Christian values."
Theology Today-Basic
Ecclesial Communities in Brazil: The Challenge of a New Way of Being Church By Marcello deC. Azevedo, S.J.Washington, D.C.,
Georgetown University Press, 1987. 304 Pp.
Copyright © 2001-2005, Niki Raapana and Nordica
Friedrich. Website: http://nord.twu.net/acl/standfor.html
Niki and Nordica are a mother-daughter team of
researchers who have researched, observed and experienced the sobering
realities and spreading dominance of communitarianism and its primary tool for change: the dialectic
process. Though we agree with their analysis of the dialectic process, we can't
endorse all their views.
"We love America
and the American people's spirit," wrote Niki. "My dad's motto
was always, 'For God, country, and the 82nd Airborne!' Ours is: 'Stop
communitarian laws. The country you save may be your own.'"
Posted by Weekly Worker 368, January 25 2001. See also: "The transition to the communitarian system" in the same issue of American Comm The Unist Party's Weekly Worker.
No comments:
Post a Comment