The Shocking Origin of the Federal Government
Is America a country
with a government, or are we a Government with a country? The initiation of
President Lincoln’s War of Northern Aggression in 1861 began a drastic change in American politics.
His Gettysburg Address strongly hinted at this change (See article, Lincoln’s
War against the Declaration), so much so that some have called his Address
a “new constitution.”
Ten years later, the Act of 1871 was passed.
It appears that this Act consolidated power and granted authority to subsequent Presidents to do all the unconstitutional and unlawful atrocities that Lincoln did during the war.
Thus, America no longer exists as founded and the Constitution is only a piece of wallpaper to keep the public fooled into thinking we live in a free country and that our government is just.
It is obvious that we are primarily a Government with a country since it is the dominant Force, rather than a country with a government.
Ten years later, the Act of 1871 was passed.
It appears that this Act consolidated power and granted authority to subsequent Presidents to do all the unconstitutional and unlawful atrocities that Lincoln did during the war.
Thus, America no longer exists as founded and the Constitution is only a piece of wallpaper to keep the public fooled into thinking we live in a free country and that our government is just.
It is obvious that we are primarily a Government with a country since it is the dominant Force, rather than a country with a government.
Two Constitutions in the United States – The 1st was illegally suspended in
favor of a Vatican “Crown” corporation
in 1871.
Vatican "Crown" Corporation
Since 1871 the United States president and
the United States Congress has been playing politics under a different set
of rules and policies. The American people do not know
that there are two Constitutions in the United States. The first penned
by the leaders of the newly independent states of the United States in
1776. On July 4, 1776, the people claimed
their independence from the Crown (temporal authority of the Roman
Catholic Pope) and Democracy was born. And for 95 years the United States
people were free and independent.
That freedom ended in 1871 when the
original “Constitution for the United States for America” was
changed to the “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”.
The Congress realized that the country was in dire financial straits, so they
made a financial deal with the
devil – the Crown (a.k.a. City of London Corporation
– est. by the Catholic Church on Jan
1, 1855 ) thereby incurring a DEBT to the pope.
The Conniving pope and his International Rothschild Bankers were not about to lend the floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations.
The Conniving pope and his International Rothschild Bankers were not about to lend the floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations.
So, they devised a way of taking back control
of the United States and thus, the
Act of 1871 was passed. With no
constitutional authority to do so,
Congress
created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia (This is
called Treason) When one is convicted of Treason in a Just Hearing They get the
choice of being shot or hung until dead.
With the passage of
“the Act of 1871” a city state (a state within a state) called the District of Columbia located on 10 sq. miles
of land in the heart of Washington was
formed with its own flag and its own
independent constitution – the United States’ secret second constitution.
The flag of
Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars, each symbolizing a city
state within the three city empire.
The three city empire consists of
Washington D.C., City of London Corporation, and Vatican City State. City
of London Corporation is the corporate center of the three city-states and
controls the world economically. Washington D.C. is in charge of the military,
and the Vatican controls it all under the guise of spiritual guidance.
Although geographically separate, the city-states of, City of London Corporation, the Vatican
and the District of Columbia are one interlocking empire called “Empire of
the City.”
The constitution for the District of Columbia operates under
tyrannical Vatican law known as “Lex Fori” (local law). When
congress illegally passed the act of 1871, it created a corporation known as
THE UNITED STATES and a separate form of government for the
District of Columbia. This treasonous act has unlawfully allowed the District
of Columbia to operate as a corporation outside the original constitution of
the United States and in total disregard of the best interests of the American
citizens.
POTUS is the Chief
Executive (President) of the Corporation of THE UNITED STATES – operating as
the CEO of the corporation. POTUS governs w/a Board of Directors (cabinet
officials) and managers (Senators and Congressmen/women). Barack Obongo, as others before him, is POTUS — operating as “vassal king” – taking orders once
again from “The Crown” through the RIIA (Royal Institute of Intl.
Affairs). The Illuminati (founded by the Society of Jesus or Jesuits, the
largest Roman Catholic Religious Military Order headed by the Black
Pope) created the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in 1919.
The American equivalent to the RIIA is
the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). The RIIA and CFR set up Round Table Groups.
What did the Act of 1871 achieve?
The ACT of 1871 put the United States back under Crown rule (which is Vatican rule). The United States people lost their independence in 1871.
What did the Act of 1871 achieve?
The ACT of 1871 put the United States back under Crown rule (which is Vatican rule). The United States people lost their independence in 1871.
THE CONSTITUTION
OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic.
It does not!
Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.
What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government.
It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic.
It does not!
Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.
What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government.
Instead of having
absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution,
We the People, now have “relative” rights or privileges.
One example is the Sovereign’s (the People) right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed – driver’s licenses and Passports.
By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution.
The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.
One example is the Sovereign’s (the People) right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed – driver’s licenses and Passports.
By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution.
The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.
As of 1871, the United States isn't a Country; it’s a Corporation!
In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Roman Catholic pope’s banking cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what “the People” believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED STATES.
Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed “the People” all rights of Sui juris (you, in your sovereignty).
The U.S.A. is a Crown
Colony.
The U.S. has always been and remains a Crown (Roman Catholic Pope) colony.
King James I is not just famous for translating the Bible into “The King James Version”, but for signing the “First Charter of Virginia” in 1606 — which granted America’s British forefathers license to settle and colonize America.
The U.S. has always been and remains a Crown (Roman Catholic Pope) colony.
King James I is not just famous for translating the Bible into “The King James Version”, but for signing the “First Charter of Virginia” in 1606 — which granted America’s British forefathers license to settle and colonize America.
The charter
guaranteed future German Roman Catholic Kings/Queens of England would have
sovereign authority over all citizens and colonized land in America.
After America
declared independence from the Crown, the Treaty of Paris,
signed on September 3, 1783 was
signed. That treaty
identifies the German Roman Catholic
King of England as prince of U.S. “Prince George the Third, by the grace of
God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of
Brunswick (Germany’s Brunswick) and Lunebourg (Germany’s Lunebourg), arch-treasurer
and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire (Roman Catholic Church) etc.,
and of the United States of America”– completely contradicting the premise
that America won The War of Independence.
Article 5 of that
treaty gave all British estates, rights and properties back to the Crown
–Catholic Church.
It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to
the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution
of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been
confiscated belonging to real British subjects; and also of the
estates, rights, and properties of persons resident in districts in the
possession on his Majesty’s arms and who have not borne arms against the
said United States. And that persons of any other description shall have free
liberty to go to any part or parts of any of the thirteen United States and
therein to remain twelve months unmolested in their endeavors to obtain the
restitution of such of their estates, rights, and properties as may have been
confiscated; and that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several
states a reconsideration and revision of all acts or laws regarding the
premises, so as to render the said laws or acts perfectly consistent not only
with justice and equity but with that spirit of conciliation which on the
return of the blessings of peace should universally prevail. And that Congress
shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates,
rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them,
they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price
(where any has been given) which such persons may have paid on purchasing any
of the said lands, rights, or properties since the confiscation.
And it is agreed
that all persons who have any interest in confiscated lands, either by debts,
marriage settlements, or otherwise, shall meet with no lawful impediment in the
prosecution of their just rights.
It is becoming
increasingly apparent to American citizens that government is no longer
being conducted in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, or, within states,
according to state constitutions.
While people have recognized for more than 150 years that the rich and powerful often corrupt individual officials, or exert undue influence to get legislation passed that favors their interests, most Americans still cling to the naive belief that such corruption is exceptional, and that most of the institutions of society: the courts, the press, and law enforcement agencies, still largely comply with the Constitution and the law in important matters.
They expect that these corrupting forces are disunited and in competition with one another, so that they tend to balance one another.
While people have recognized for more than 150 years that the rich and powerful often corrupt individual officials, or exert undue influence to get legislation passed that favors their interests, most Americans still cling to the naive belief that such corruption is exceptional, and that most of the institutions of society: the courts, the press, and law enforcement agencies, still largely comply with the Constitution and the law in important matters.
They expect that these corrupting forces are disunited and in competition with one another, so that they tend to balance one another.
Mounting evidence
makes it clear that the situation is far worse than most people think, that
during the last several decades the U.S. Constitution has been effectively
overthrown, and that it is now observed only as a facade to deceive and placate
the masses. What has replaced it is what many call the Shadow Government –
created with the illegal passing of the Act of 1871.
It still, for the most part, operates in secret, because its control is not secure.
The exposure of this regime and its operations must now become a primary duty of citizens who still believe in the Rule of Law and in the freedoms which this country is supposed to represent. – Cathleen Commentary of Team Law
It still, for the most part, operates in secret, because its control is not secure.
The exposure of this regime and its operations must now become a primary duty of citizens who still believe in the Rule of Law and in the freedoms which this country is supposed to represent. – Cathleen Commentary of Team Law
“Corp. U.S.” Myth 1: The District of Columbia Act of
1871 incorporated the municipal government of the District of Columbia into a
municipal corporation.
From time to time people ask us questions similar to the
following:
“An initial review
of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 seems like it only incorporates a local government (like
Chicago or Seattle); how do you get that they formed a private corporation?”
If you take the Act out of its historical context and, from
the present, look to the Act, in the past, not knowing its history, then merely imagine who the parties are
involved, you might agree with the presupposition that the Act merely incorporated a municipality.
However, such a review will not help you understand the meaning of any actual Act; thus, to best understand what actually happened we follow our “Standard for Review” to first discover the history behind the relationship; and, second, we look to the terms and conditions of the Act, by reviewing the Act itself, to see how it fits in accord with law and our history.
However, such a review will not help you understand the meaning of any actual Act; thus, to best understand what actually happened we follow our “Standard for Review” to first discover the history behind the relationship; and, second, we look to the terms and conditions of the Act, by reviewing the Act itself, to see how it fits in accord with law and our history.
Thus, to understand the
parties involved in the District of
Columbia Organic Act of 1871 (hereinafter, “DCOA”), we must first understand who are the parties involved in
the relationship as described by the Act.
We are not going to delve into the Act here, in its entirety; suffice it to say, looking over the situation, we find the Act is one made by the original jurisdiction government’s Congress, as set by the Constitution for the United States of America.
We are not going to delve into the Act here, in its entirety; suffice it to say, looking over the situation, we find the Act is one made by the original jurisdiction government’s Congress, as set by the Constitution for the United States of America.
The DCOA describes its venue as: “all that
part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the
District of Columbia”.
The District of Columbia was originally provided for in the Constitution for the United States of America (Sept. 17, 1787) at Article 1 Section 8, specifically in the last two clauses.
Then, on July 16, 1790, in accord with the provisions of those clauses, the Territory was formed in the District of Columbia Act, wherein the “ten mile square” territory was permanently created and made the permanent location of the country’s government; that is to say, the “territory” so provided for included both the land and its actual government. Under that Act, Congress also made the President the civic leader of the local government in all matters in said Territory.
Then, on February 27, 1801, under the second District of Columbia Act, two counties were formed and their respective officers and district judges were appointed. Further, the established town governments of Alexandria, Georgetown and Washington were recognized as constituted and placed under the laws of the District, its judges, etc. The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly called this Act (of, February 27, 1801) the “District of Columbia Organization Act” or the “Charter Act of the District of Columbia” and recognized it as the incorporation of the “municipality” known as the “District of Columbia”.
Then, on March 3, 1801, a Supplementary Act to that last Act, noted here, added the authority that the Marshals appointed by the respective District Court Judges collectively form a County Commission with the authority to appoint all officers as may be needed in similarity to the respective State officials in the states whence the counties Washington and Alexandria came, those being: Maryland and Virginia, respectively.
The District of Columbia was originally provided for in the Constitution for the United States of America (Sept. 17, 1787) at Article 1 Section 8, specifically in the last two clauses.
Then, on July 16, 1790, in accord with the provisions of those clauses, the Territory was formed in the District of Columbia Act, wherein the “ten mile square” territory was permanently created and made the permanent location of the country’s government; that is to say, the “territory” so provided for included both the land and its actual government. Under that Act, Congress also made the President the civic leader of the local government in all matters in said Territory.
Then, on February 27, 1801, under the second District of Columbia Act, two counties were formed and their respective officers and district judges were appointed. Further, the established town governments of Alexandria, Georgetown and Washington were recognized as constituted and placed under the laws of the District, its judges, etc. The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly called this Act (of, February 27, 1801) the “District of Columbia Organization Act” or the “Charter Act of the District of Columbia” and recognized it as the incorporation of the “municipality” known as the “District of Columbia”.
Then, on March 3, 1801, a Supplementary Act to that last Act, noted here, added the authority that the Marshals appointed by the respective District Court Judges collectively form a County Commission with the authority to appoint all officers as may be needed in similarity to the respective State officials in the states whence the counties Washington and Alexandria came, those being: Maryland and Virginia, respectively.
According to the United
States Supreme Court those charter
acts (first acts) were the official incorporation
of the formal government (with its municipalities) of the District of Columbia
as chartered by Congress in accord with the Constitution’s provision.
Again, the Supreme Court called that body of government “a corporation”, with the right to sue and be sued. Respectively, since 1801, the District of Columbia has been consistently recognized as a “municipal corporation” with its own government.
Again, the Supreme Court called that body of government “a corporation”, with the right to sue and be sued. Respectively, since 1801, the District of Columbia has been consistently recognized as a “municipal corporation” with its own government.
That sets the basics for the first rule of A Standard for Review, ‘know the parties’.
What we have presented is sufficient to show the basics of who the parties are as they related to resolving the answer to the question above. We admonish everyone to prove the facts for themselves by their own research.
What we have presented is sufficient to show the basics of who the parties are as they related to resolving the answer to the question above. We admonish everyone to prove the facts for themselves by their own research.
The second rule from A Standard for Review is:
“Then you must understand the environmental nature of the relationship.”
With that in mind let’s consider the events of the time:
Congress had at least three problems; they could see no way to directly cure by following the laws of the land (as constituted): they were out of funds, they had promised 40 acres of land to each slave that left the South to fight for the North and they had to reintegrate the south into the Union; which they could not do without controlling the appointment of the Southern States Congressional members.
There were other problems; but these three stand out from the rest. That is enough about the environment for the purposes of this review; however, the more you study the historical events of this time, the more obvious the relationships will become and the more proof you will amass to prove the facts of what actually happened. In the interest of time, space and the topic of this response, we will move on.
the Civil War had
recently ended and the country was still under Lincoln’s Conscription Act
(Martial Law).
Congress had at least three problems; they could see no way to directly cure by following the laws of the land (as constituted): they were out of funds, they had promised 40 acres of land to each slave that left the South to fight for the North and they had to reintegrate the south into the Union; which they could not do without controlling the appointment of the Southern States Congressional members.
There were other problems; but these three stand out from the rest. That is enough about the environment for the purposes of this review; however, the more you study the historical events of this time, the more obvious the relationships will become and the more proof you will amass to prove the facts of what actually happened. In the interest of time, space and the topic of this response, we will move on.
The last step of the Standard for Review’s discovery process
requires a review of the actual terms of the relationship.
Thus, we
review the first paragraph of the DCOA; where Congress wrote:
That all that part of the territory of the United States
included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is
hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by
which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes …
and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.
Given that even the Supreme
Court confirms that the government of the District of Columbia was already “created into a government”, so
formed into a municipal incorporation in 1801 under the District of Columbia
Acts, we wonder, even with Congress’
constitutional authority to pass any law within the ten mile square of the District, how do you create, or incorporate, for
the first time, a municipal government
that has already been in existence as a municipal
corporation for over 70 years?
The obvious answer is, “It’s
impossible!”
There is no way
to pass an “Organic Act” when the “Charter Act” is already in place, because
the two words (organic and charter) have the same meaning—The First Act.
Though historians can make history appear to change by
rewriting it for those unwilling to study the past from the actual records of
the past. Even Congress cannot
change the actual history. However, the records speak for themselves
only if, and when, we study them.
When you consider the historical
facts, the only meaning left for the
terms given in the opening paragraph of the DCOA (and that which follows) is, the municipal corporation that
was created is a private corporation owned by the actual government.
Further, the only government created in that Act was the same form of private government any private corporation
has within the operation of its own corporate construct. Thus, we coined
the term, “Corp. U.S.”; to
distinguish that corporation from the actual “original jurisdiction” government, as it was formed in accord with
the Constitution for the United States of America.
We also note Congress reserved the right, granted them in
said Constitution, to pass and enforce virtually any law within the District of
Columbia; which is almost complete dictatorial authority over their Corp. U.S.
construct, without regard for its internal operations or officers.
Thus,
Congress can lawfully use Corp. U.S. as they see fit, within that portion of
the ten-mile square defined as the District of Columbia. Respectively
(through that authority), the members of Congress now wore two hats; one hat
for their original jurisdiction government official seat and a second more
effective hat as a corporate board member titled with the same names:
“Congressman”; “Representative” or “Senator”; the President also effectively
wore two similar hats.
Thus, our historical records and laws clearly show that
Corp. U.S. is not merely an incorporated municipality; rather, it is a private
Corporation that was lawfully created by our original jurisdiction government.
We find no legal or lawful problem with the formation of
Corp. U.S., as shown above. The Constitution provided Congress with the
authority to pass any law within the ten mile square of the District of
Columbia; however, with the creation of such a thing, the people would have to
remain more vigilant to make sure that such a corporation was not used to
extend authoritarian power beyond bounds of said District, to usurp
authoritarian styled power over the people of the nation by force.
Of course, because the people failed to exercise such
vigilance that is exactly what is happening today. Respectively, the only
way to peacefully remedy this situation is the people must learn the law and
apply it to restore our original jurisdiction government (see: Governor’s
Corner).
Meanwhile, please remember, Team Law is here to help you
learn how to learn the Law; so you can apply it to preserve our peace, your
freedom and our nation. Of course, so long as people continue to focus
their minds on imagining doom and gloom because of what they think other people
are, or are not, willing to do, they limit themselves from the only thing that
keeps them from becoming part of the solution instead of part of the problem.
The solution is simple, because it starts with each one of
us and there is no time like the present to start making a difference. We
have repeatedly proven that learning and applying the law works. And,
History proves that, even at the worst of times, the best opportunities of our
lives can only happen if we take the first step and so, start to move in the
right direction to create a powerful positive future. – teamlaw.org
“Lincoln’s war was to forcibly subdue the individual nations
to the centralized power of the Federal Government, and make them bow to the
will of Washington. On the other hand, the War for Independence was to free the
individual nations from the centralized power of Great Britain, so they would
not have to bow to the will of the king.
Lincoln replaced Britain’s king with
Washington’s King. Lincoln’s War changed America from these united States
(plural) with self-rule, to the United States (singular) with centralized
Federal rule. [This was corporatized with the Act of 1871]” – Joel Taylor,Lincoln’s
War against the Declaration
Quotes from Matrix and Constitution by
Judge Hale
The true purpose of the Constitution was to create a
business plan and to establish a Military Government, for the protection of the
Founding Fathers, the kings commerce, protection of his Agents and the future
control of his subject Slaves!
Even the preamble of the U. S. Constitution is a
clue to the lie; and which states, “...to ourselves and our posterity!” If you
never saw the title, “The Constitution,” and you were never told what this
document was about; what do you think would be your first impression upon
hearing or reading: “...to ourselves and our posterity!”
The CONSTITUTION is
not for “We the People”
AMERICA is a Matrix of misinformation. In the eyes
of those in control, America is nothing more than a large Plantation and “We
the People” are the Slaves.
Initially, their plan was to steal America away from the
King; despite the fact that king George funded the exploration of the New
World, which legally gave him first claim to all new continents discovered.
The
seizure of the Americas by the kings explorers was not as it has been depicted
in our history books or presented to us by our government, in our government
controlled public schools. One thing the Founding Fathers did not know, was that
all of the kings lands and all future acquisitions, had been given and pledged
by king John to Pope Innocent III and the Holy Roman Church, by the Treaty of
1213.
After that fact was proven to the Founding Fathers, king George and
representatives from the Vatican, decided to use the constitutional draft
created by the Founding Fathers, to further their plan to control the
colonists!
Control attained by bringing the colonists to their knees in debt!
Any way you read it, the Constitution was never written with the intent of
benefiting the American people!
Did you know that 98% of the Law Schools in America and
England do not include constitutional law as a part of their law curriculum?
The reason for this phenomenon is because constitutional law does not apply to
or affect the enforcement of statutes, codes or administrative regulations,
which have replaced constitutional law, the common law, public law and penal
law, and which have been designed to control you.
Constitutional law is taught
as an elective at Harvard, Yale and Cambridge, and only for students of law who
are planning a future career in government.
In the true history
of America, neither side won the Revolutionary
War! At first, the appearance of English troops in the colonies, was simply
a show of force by king George
intended to intimidate the colonists
and force them to pay him taxes. Factually,
back in England, English soldiers
refused to take up arms against the
colonists because they were English
citizens and relatives. Mr. Mayer Amschel Bauer, founder of the Rothschild Banking Empire, by this time owned the
king! Mr. Bauer had extended unlimited
credit to the king and arranged
contracts with him, which permitted
the Rothschild Tax Collectors to
represent and collect the kings Tax
from the king’s subjects. [This is the origin of the concept behind the establishment
of the IRS]. It was Bauer who suggested to king George that
he enforce a Tax against the colonists
in the New World, since the tax, being
collected in England was barely enough to
pay the interest on the kings loans. When English soldiers refused to
fight, Mr. Bauer negotiated a contract with unemployed Russian/Germanic soldiers, to fight for King George, at
a cost of 50¢ a day. Bauer then
informed king George that he had hired
these soldiers in the kings name but at a cost of $1.00 a day! King George utilized
these soldiers, dressing them in English
uniforms and ordered his career
officers to command them. When his show
of force in the colonies failed, Mr. Bauer suggested that king George finance the colonists in their war efforts
against him, and bring the colonists to
their knees in debt! The king succeeded in accomplishing this through his appointed civilian figureheads in charge of his government of France. Mr. Bauer wanted to expand his banking empire into the colonies. He discovered that the colonists did not trade in gold or silver
but used script as the basis of their economy! The script money used were promissory
notes printed by the colonists. All the colonists agreed that they would
consider these notes the lawful currency
of the colonies. Mr. Bauer wanted gold
or silver and induced the king to
demand that his tax in the colonies
be paid in gold or silver! It was that condition “that broke the camels back”
and caused the Boston Tea Party! “Whoever controls the money - controls the
country” (Rothschild).
Surreptitiously,
king George infiltrated the colonies and
their feudal attempt to form a new government using spies composed of English
lawyers and aristocrats loyal to him. The spies assignment was to infiltrate
the new government, carry out the plan to defeat the colonists through debt,
and establish regular reports to the King. The church also had their appointed
representative in place to protect and insure that their interest was being
observed.
Much of the loans
received from the French, went into
the pockets of the founding fathers! The founding fathers eventually conceded to king George and the unholy Roman Church’s demands by and through the intervention and persuasiveness of the kings
spies.
Ironically, the common denominator or glue that eventually bound king George, the founding fathers,
the English lawyers and English aristocrats together was a secret society
called the “Illuminati.”
Even Paul Revere and
Benjamin Franklin, were members of the Illuminati!
This secret society had a criminal and deadly past in Europe and in America they were
eventually renamed, “The Free and
Accepted Masons.” The majority of the
regular membership of the Free and Accepted Masons, do not know about the “Illuminati influence” within their rank and
file.
The Illuminati members operate out of special secret
societies separate from the regular Masonic membership and are found in every branch of the Free and Accepted Masons of the World!
Think about the colonists who we have been taught to revere by our public school system!
All of these individuals were members
of this secret society and all were
traitors.
An example of a man
in history we have been taught to revere is Benjamin Franklin. Would it shock you to learn that he was on the kings payroll and his many trips to England, was actually to
report on the colonial government to
king George? The Declaration of
Independence is another story omitted
from our American history books.
Of the fifty-one men involved in the
creation of the Declaration of Independence,
twenty-one were actually on the king’s payroll.
During the
Revolutionary War, English officers were
provided the names, addresses and family members of these thirty loyalists involved in the creation and signing
of the Declaration of Independence.
The English soldiers had been ordered to hunt down and murder all thirty loyalists,
their wives, children and all relatives, with further instructions to burn
their bodies inside their homes.
The soldiers were to
leave no trace of these men and their families, to wipe out their existence for an eternity! The history of
civilizations has taught us all that
martyrs are dangerous to men of
power and king George didn’t want to
leave any martyrs!
It is obvious who provided the detailed information about the
thirty loyalists, their family and addresses! At first glance, it appeared
that Guy Madison of Virginia was so concerned about lawyers holding any position in American government that he championed the 13th Amendment, which
barred lawyers from holding any public office in government! The 13th Amendment was ratified, but never
made it into print in our government
controlled school books and public
classrooms. The Amendment was surreptitiously removed and replaced by the 14th Amendment. The 15th Amendment
became the 14th and so on. Madison’s efforts appear admirable but
his later actions, as a member of the 1st Congress, suggests that his only real concern was to block lawyers
from undermining the theft that he and his compatriots had planned for America! Once the
cost of the Revolutionary War sufficiently placed the colonists in debt, the English
soldiers were ordered to dispense with their efforts, recover their arms and within the next eight years
they eventually returned to England. The colonists were so glad to see the
fighting stop that they allowed the soldiers to retreat and exit America
peacefully.
There is an old legal
maxim that states: “The first to leave the field of battle loses.”
Pursuant to this
maxim, the founding fathers proclaimed the colonists the victors! A maxim is a
legal truth that is time honored and incorruptible.
In reality, the war was just a diversion! The Colonists had no chance of succeeding in their
efforts. Examine the facts for yourself. During this era, England had the largest Army and Navy in the World. king George
owned England, Ireland and France,
having a combined population of
about 60 million subjects.
The colonists
were poorly educated, poorly armed and composed of farmers, tradesmen, bonded
slaves, women and children and boasted a total population of only 3 million subjects. And
considering the undermining that was
occurring to their nation by the Kings spies and the founding fathers, the
colonists didn’t have a prayer of defeating the English!
Americans have
been indoctrinated by our federal and
state governments and through
government controlled public schools
and literature, media and churches (YES, EVEN THE CHURCHES) to believe that America defeated the English!
We celebrate that
victory and our so-called Independence each year on the 4th of July, and it is all a bunch of propaganda; a carrot to lead the horse and keep
this society stupid and passive!
We boast today that our country represents the finest
schools in the world, but in reality, we’re
no smarter than the first colonists! We only know more about other things
because of new technology developments during the last 250 years and yet the
average IQ of America is 70.
Documented proof that
the Constitution was not for us can be found at: Padelford, Fay& Co. v. The
Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah, [14 Georgia 438, 520].
This was a court case
wherein the Plaintiffs sued the City of
Savannah, for violating what they
believed were their constitutionally
protected rights! The decision of
the Judge says it all: "But indeed, no private person has a right to
complain, by suit in Court, on the
ground of a breach of the Constitution; the Constitution, it is true, is a
compact but he (the private person) is not a party to it!"
The United States
Constitution was converted into a Trust and the legal definition of a Trust is:
“A legal obligation with respect to property given by one person (donor), to another (trustee), to the advantage
of a beneficiary (Americans).” The
property in this Trust includes all
land, your personal possessions that
you believe you own and your physical
body. The donor of the Trust is the king of England and the unholy Roman
Church. The Trustees are all federal and state public officials, which means
that they truly are Agents of a foreign
power, the king and the Vatican.
The reason the
Constitution was converted into a Trust is because, as a non-trust business plan, the
Constitution completely bound the hands
of our government officials! By their converting
it into a Trust, our public
officials were then free to make any
changes they desired to this government without their constituents knowledge!
The rules of a Trust are secret and no trustee can be compelled to divulge those rules, and the rules can be changed by the trustees without notice to
the beneficiary! The one pitfall
confronting them and their plan was the fact that by converting the
Constitution into a Trust, our public officials had to legally assign a
beneficiary; and the beneficiary chosen could not offend or be in contrast to
the numerous International Treaties that were in force. Our public officials
wanted to stay in control of the Trust as the trustees; however, a trustee cannot also be a beneficiary! So
even though the Constitution was never designed or written for the Sovereign
American people, they unknowingly became
the beneficiary of this secret Trust and hence, the creation of the
“propaganda” regarding our Constitutional Rights!
All high ranking public
officials, lawyers and judges laugh at the ignorance of people who claim
that their Constitutional Rights have
been violated! Lawyers are actually taught to treat the members of the
general public as inferior individuals!
This also explains the ‘air of
arrogance’ that most lawyers convey
in their demeanor and speech!
The more powerful Agents of the states and the federal
government however, have been stealing
the benefits from the Trust through numerous maneuvers that have the appearance
of being lawful. In their defense, many former public officials (Agents) were not corrupt to begin with but, by
accepting bribes or as the result of enjoying an arranged extramarital
relationship, they became the victim of an extortion
plot and succumbed to the threat to
expose the bribe or their illicit affair to their constituents!
By becoming an Agent
all was forgiven and forgotten! The people who arranged the bribes also
arranged the situations and applied the
pressure to force honest men to
become dishonest. [An example of this could be a sudden demand by a Bank to pay off a loan based upon a hidden clause
in the loan contract and which could
result in a foreclosure, bankruptcy and scandal.]
There are no
remaining public federal employees in America!
All employees who you believe to be a part of America’s
government, are actually agents of a
foreign government and this definition includes the President.
The federal elections
are a joke on us!
All of the candidates have been jointly preselected and prescreened by the national boards of the Republican and Democrat parties well before the election process. All of our
federally elected officials, appointed administrators, federal police
and judges, receive their paychecks through the Office of Personnel Management.
OPM is a division of
the International Monetary Fund, which is owned by the Rockefeller and Rothschild
families and their Banking Empires, which operates in tandem with the
United Nations. The IRS and Interpol
are owned by the International Monetary Fund, which has been identified in an earlier version of the U. S. Army Manual, as a Communist
Organization.
Those Americans, who do not know how to assert their beneficiary status are treated by the government and
their courts as a corporate fiction!
The corporate governments and their courts only have jurisdiction over
corporations. Corporations have no
rights or jurisdiction over living people and are only provided
considerations, which have been pre-negotiated
in contracts by their directors. Otherwise, they are governed totally by commercial law, and so are you!
On every form you file to receive “government benefits” and even the “voter registration form, “there is a question that asks: Are you a United States Citizen? YES / NO
and everyone circles the YES answer. Didn’t you? Now look up the definition of a “United States Citizen,” in a reputable
law dictionary. You will discover
that a United States Citizen is a phrase
designed to identify a “corporate fiction!” Clever, isn’t it?
You and every
other American had no idea that you were admitting you were a corporate fiction when you circled that YES answer, and you did it under penalty of perjury!
The sovereign States had been abolished in 1790 by the adoption of Article 1 of the Statutes at Large, which converted all the
sovereign states into federal districts
and gave the federal government lawful jurisdiction everywhere.
In consideration of the fact that the federal government is a corporation and that corporations can
lawfully own other corporations, and all the American subjects to be educated
have admitted under penalty of perjury that they are corporations, the Supreme
Court ruled in favor of the corporate federal government. [See how sneaky and
tricky lawyers can be? And all the more reason why lawyers should never be
allowed to serve in government or in judgment of us.]
Under our corporate
governments, no Sovereign can lawfully be tried or convicted of any
statutory crime! I recently discovered how to avoid prosecution under the
Trust, when a Sovereign is taken before a corporate prosecuting Attorney or a
Judge:
First: “the Sovereign must inquire if we are on the record, and if not,
insist upon it! Say nothing, sign nothing and answer no questions until you are
convinced that the proceedings are being recorded!”
Secondly: all a Sovereign
has to say for the record is: “I am a beneficiary of the Trust and I am
appointing you as my Trustee!”
Thirdly: the Sovereign then directs his Trustee
to do his bidding! “As my Trustee, I want you to discharge this matter I am
accused of and eliminate the record!”
Fourthly: if the Sovereign suffered any
damages as a result of his arrest, he can direct that the Trust compensate him
from the proceeds of the Court by saying, “I wish to be compensated for (X)
dollars in redemption.”
This statement is sufficient to remove the authority
and jurisdiction from any prosecuting attorney or judge.
The accused will be
immediately released from custody, with a check, license or claim he identifies
as a damage. It doesn't matter what the action involves or how it is classified
by the corporate law as a civil or criminal action! It works every time!
All of the Codes, Statutes and Regulations throughout the
United States are a Will from the Masters to their Slaves. A Will is defined
as, “An express command used in a dispositive nature.”
When individuals in
America are charged with a crime and warehoused in a jail, it is because they
went against the Will of the Masters, and not because they harmed another
person!
Remember that: The Will demands from us, all that we are; keeps us in
check and promises us nothing! The police officer, who arrested you, has been
“brainwashed” into believing that he is doing the right thing, when in fact he
is nothing more than an “armed slave acting as a henchman” and hired to bully
and intimidate all other Slaves into submission of the Masters Will! This
statement will probably offend most police officers but this is fact and it is
not their fault. Most police officers believe they are performing a public
service and doing the right thing in the performance of duty.
They have been
lied to by the government and in most cases police officers are pumped full of
lies more so than anybody else! Recently, the Police have all been ordered to
complete paramilitary training and were told that this is essential because of
the new threat of Terrorism. The people responsible for this training and
brainwashing are the same people and foreign Agents who have been controlling
all of us since our birth! NOTE: I’ll bet that nobody told these police
officers that these suspected Terrorists may come at them from their very own
government officials! So now, our government officials have our police officers
training to act as a military unit – follow our orders and don’t think! They
have succeeded in placing these officers on edge so that their every reaction
will be an over-reaction to the situation.
Near the end of this paper, it will disclosed to the reader
about a situation that has been planned by our government officials and is soon
to unfold!
The police paramilitary training and their extensive brainwashing
has been implemented specifically for this event! It is expected that police
officers will over-react and begin killing innocent Americans; and once they
are no longer of use, the officers and their families will all be ordered to
receive vaccinations that will kill all of them! My guess is that after this
planned mass genocide has occurred, the Russian and Chinese military will
replace them in the field. Part of the Fraud perpetrated against “We the
People” by this Will, is the fact that there are actually no criminal laws in
America. The Rules of Procedure used by every Local, State and Federal Court
are Civil Rules, not Criminal. Court officials simply substitute the word
criminal for civil, depending upon the case at hand. Rule 1 of the Rules of
Civil Procedure Reads: “There shall be but one form of action, a civil action.”
This means that the Criminal laws promulgated and enforced by the police and
our corporate governments are all civil and are being fraudulently enforced
against our “corporate fictions” as criminal. When anyone goes to jail, it is
for a civil infraction of the Masters Will. That makes all of our jails,
debtors prisons! Does that Ring a Constitutional Bell? Title 18, Federal Crimes
and Offenses, was never voted on by the Congress; which means that these
federal laws are NOT positive law in America! Now, if you were a part of a
government conspiracy to destroy America and soon to commit a mass genocide of
its population, would you really want to vote Title 18 into positive law? My
belief is that the Congress intentionally omitted its passage so that members
of Congress could use that as a defense should they be caught and tried for
Treason! Do you believe the lawyers hired or appointed to represent all the
individuals accused of federal crimes knew about this fact? You bet they know!
Armed with this fact: now look at the number of convicted people sitting in
federal prisons who believe they have been lawfully convicted of violating a
federal crime! How many do you imagine have been put to death? How many were
shot and killed during the arrest? How many were killed attempting to escape
from their illegal confinement? The Internal Revenue Code relies upon Title 18
to convict people of Tax Evasion, which only applies to corporations. Look at
all the people sitting in federal prisons who were convicted of this so-called
crime. What makes it worse is the fact that the Queen of England entered into a
Treaty with the federal government for the taxing of alcoholic beverages and
cigarettes sold in America. The Treaty is called The Stamp Act and in this Act
the Queen ordained that her subjects, the American people, are exonerated of
all other federal taxes. So the federal income tax and the state incomes taxes
levied against all Americans is contrary to an International Treaty and against
the Sovereign Orders of the Queen! Like it or not, the Queen is our Monarch and
Master! The Tax is illegal and still people have been prosecuted and imprisoned,
contrary to law! One hundred percent (100%) of the people sentenced and held in
all American Jails have either been convicted of crimes that are not positive
law or were convicted of civil crimes, and are being detained there by their
consent! That’s Right! The lawyers and judges representing our legislature and
judicial system created maneuvers to insure that anyone who is accused of a
so-called crime and posts bail, signs a contract to appear and consents by that
contract to the proceedings scheduled.
Anyone who applies for a public defender
signs the same contract without knowing it and anyone who privately hires a
lawyer to represent them in a Court proceeding consents to the same contract
upon the lawyer filing a “Notice of Appearance!”
When you hire a lawyer, you
signed a Power of Attorney. He is required to file his Notice of Appearance in
that case and that Notice of Appearance offers your consent and binds your
appearance to the proceedings!
Absent these aforementioned contracts, the Court
cannot proceed against you! When that occurs, the Judge and the Prosecutor
attempt to trick and intimidate you into giving your consent.
If you don’t know
how to invoke your Sovereignty, and you take what they throw at you, and stand
your ground; they will be forced to release you after 72 hours has elapsed! I’m not a bleeding heart liberal who
believes that we should open up the jails and let everyone out. There are
people in our jails who need to be there, despite the fact that they have been
incarcerated illegally! My vote is to leave that hornets’ nest alone!
We American’s are so proud of the fact that we live in a
Democracy. Now look up the word “Democracy”
in a reputable Law Dictionary and see the legal meaning. Democracy is defined
as: “A Socialist form of government and another form of Communism.” Do you
remember the lies that President Reagan, the Congress and the Media told
America? – Judge Hale
Commentary of Griffin
Many Internet commentators claim that using all upper-case
letters when printing the name United States of America or when printing names
of individuals has a profound legal implication. However, I have not been able
to confirm this. If anyone can show me a law or court case to the contrary, I
will readily acknowledge it; but so far, I only have found assertions of this
claim with no authoritative documentation. In the meantime, I am satisfied with
the conclusion of the Dixieland Law Journal at http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/NamesInCaps.htm that
there is no legal basis for this theory.
Now, to the bigger issue. Even if it were true that Congress
in 1871 converted the United States into a corporation (a claim that I do not
accept), there would be two questions that must be answered: (1) what would be
the practical significance and (2) what can be done about it?
Let’s take the first question: what would be the practical
significance of a corporate government versus a constitutional government? In
one case, the charter is a corporate charter. In the other case, it is a
constitution. Both are written documents and both outline the purpose,
function, and limitations of the entity they create. The primary difference is
that a corporation always is the creation of government, which makes government
a higher source with powers assumed to be derived from the people themselves.
In the case of the United States, however, this distinction is blurred, because
the federal constitution was created by representatives of the colonial governments.
That means the United States was created by other governments just as it would
have been if created as a corporation.
The structure of government is important
but not as important as the power of government. That is also
true of corporations. Governments and corporations are neither good nor evil by
themselves. They can serve man well or be a huge disservice depending entirely
on the terms of their charters and the character of those who direct them.
Private entrepreneurs, partnerships, and associations have exactly the same
capacity for good or evil. Corporations become evil when they acquire political
favoritism giving them unfair advantages over competitors and legal immunity
from crimes – but exactly the same thing happens with politically connected
individuals, partnerships, and associations.
A similar contrast between good and evil is found within
governments, whether they are corporations or not. There is little difference
between corporations and governments except ownership of stock. Too much is
made over the structure of government and too little over
the principles of government. Which would we choose: a
corporate government with a charter that limits its powers and with functioning
mechanisms to choose our leaders – or a constitutional government in which the
constitution is subverted and the electoral system is in the hands of a ruling
elite?
Guns do not commit
crimes but people using guns do. Likewise, organizational structures are
not the problem; it’s the people who control those structures and the
principles they embrace. Evil men can subvert any social structure. There are
no set of rules that can prevent it if the public becomes indifferent, which is
why Wendell Phillips reminded us that "Eternal vigilance is the price of
liberty."
We should be thankful that America started off as a
constitutional republic, but that was long ago.
Today we live under a democratic oligarchy [the corporation]
in which the masses are hypnotized
into believing they control their political destiny because they are allowed to
elect their own dictators.
This conversion did not happen because of how
government was chartered but because collectivists
took control of political parties, media centers, educational institutions, and all other power centers of society.
As long as collectivists remain in
control, and as long as most people
don't even know what the word collectivism
means, it makes no difference if
government has a constitutional or a
corporate charter.
Freedom is lost
either way.
The important
question is what can be done?
Even if it were true that the United States was secretly converted to a corporation in 1871, what can be done about it today? If we don’t have an answer to that question, we are wasting our time. The enemies of freedom must be happy to see us chasing phantom issues because, as long as we do, we are out of the battle. The solution to the loss of our constitutional republic is, not to endlessly debate the meaning of an obscure event in 1871, but to take action today to recapture our government from the collectivists who have subverted it and then set about to restore the republic! – G. Edward Griffin
Even if it were true that the United States was secretly converted to a corporation in 1871, what can be done about it today? If we don’t have an answer to that question, we are wasting our time. The enemies of freedom must be happy to see us chasing phantom issues because, as long as we do, we are out of the battle. The solution to the loss of our constitutional republic is, not to endlessly debate the meaning of an obscure event in 1871, but to take action today to recapture our government from the collectivists who have subverted it and then set about to restore the republic! – G. Edward Griffin
Resources:
http://www.wakeupsaxons.com/2014/05/the-united-states-of-america-is.html
compiled by Jim Jester
http://www.wakeupsaxons.com/2014/01/who-brought-slaves-to-america.html
I have gathered the following articles for your perusal. I found various versions on the Internet of an article authored by Lisa Guliani, Country or Corporation! Act of 1871, posted Feb 5, 2011 at the Minnesota Tenth Amendment Center (.com). I did not see credit given to Lisa on these other versions so I am doing so now, for she has done a great service in educating Americans about the evil workings of our (alleged) government in this country. I have not reproduced her article here, but instead have given a slightly shorter version by Cathleen, From the Trenches World Report (.com), who has also brought in the British Crown and the Vatican into this conspiracy. Following this is an examination of the subject from Team Law (.org). Another opinion related to this subject comes from Judge Hale who claims the Constitution was a Trust for the Founding Fathers only. Finally, the last section is G. Edward Griffin’s comments on the subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment