“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. 

The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, 
and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. 

It is impossible for both the Constitution and 
a law violating it to be valid; 

one must prevail.

This is succinctly stated as follows: 
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from 
the date of the decision so branding it. 

As unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative 
as if it had never been passed. 

Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted. 

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and 
justifies no acts performed under it... 

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. 
An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede 
any existing valid law. 

Indeed, in so far as a statute runs counter 
to the fundamental law of the land, 
it is superseded thereby. 

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” Any court, government or government officer who acts in violation of, in opposition or contradiction to the foregoing, by his, or her own actions, commits treason and invokes the self-executing Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and vacates his or her, office.

End of Story! 

Tell them their false flag operations didn't fool anyone and they will not achieve the results they had hoped for originally.

Tell the Communists in DC when they visit to get over it....
and they are under arrest... charge the subversive parasites with treason, hang the guilty and evict all the rest. 

All sub race people who remain on your land must leave. Our people are to be Holy, Set-Apart, Separated from the beasts of the field (so we don't form their habits, aptitude, become mongrelised, or be decieved by the snakes or the dog's.

Inform them they are trespassing and they may be shot on sight. The old saying was if someone is on your land without your permission they are generally up to no good and may be shot.

The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

Hos 4:6  My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I will also reject you, that you may be no priest to me. Because you have forgotten your God’s law, I will also forget your children. 

The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.

Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the Organized Militia (the National Guard) cannot be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States."

The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.

During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.

The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.

Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: 

"The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States." In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, 

"that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it."

"This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose. 

Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power." 

The State did not give the Citizen his rights and thus cannot take them away as it chooses. 

The State did not establish the settled maxims and procedures by which a citizen must be dealt with, and thus cannot 
abrogate or circumvent them. 

It thus is well settled that legislative enactments do not constitute the law of the land, but must conform to it.

"For more than six hundred years--that is, since Magna Carta, in 
1215, there has been no clearer principle of English or American
constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases,
constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, 

it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, 

to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the  law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is  also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of  the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in 
their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in 
violating, or resisting the execution of,
such laws."

"In the trial of all criminal cases, the Jury shall be the Judges of
Law, as well as of fact, except that the Court may pass upon the
sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction." Article XXIII,
Constitution of Maryland.

The jury has an "unreviewable and irreversible power...to acquit
disregard of the instructions on the law given by the trial
judge...The pages of history shine on instances of the jury's
exercise of its prerogative to disregard uncontradicted evidence
instructions of the judge; for example, acquittals under the
fugitive slave law. U.S. v. Dougherty, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, 1972,
473 F.2d at 1130 and 1132. 
(Nevertheless, the majority opinion held
that jurors need not be told this. Dissenting Chief Judge Bazelon
thought that they ought to be so told.)

Thomas Jefferson
held  that jurors need not be told this. Dissenting Chief Judge Bazelon  thought that they ought to be so told.) 
Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1789: "I consider trial by jury as the
anchor yet imagined by
man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its
only  anchor yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution."
"It would be an absurdity for jurors to be required to accept the judge's view of the law, against their own opinion, judgment, and conscience." --John Adams

Juries are taken, by lot or by suffrage, from the mass of the  people, and no man can be condemned of life or limb or property or  reputation without the concurrence of the voice of the people. . . . 

Whenever a general verdict is found, it assuredly determines both the fact and the law.

a general verdict is found, it assuredly determines both the fact  and the law. It was never yet disputed or doubted that a general ver-
dict, given under the direction of the court in point of law, was a
legal determination of the issue.

dict, given under the direction of the court in point of law, was a  legal determination of the issue. Therefore, the jury have a power
of deciding an issue upon a gen-eral verdict.

of deciding an issue upon a gen-eral verdict. And, if they have, is it
not an absurdity to suppose
not an absurdity to suppose that the law would oblige them to
find a verdict according to the direction of the court, against their own
opinion, judgment, and conscience? .

opinion, judgment, and conscience? . . . 

Should the melancholy case arise that the judges should give their opin-ions to the jury against . . . 

Fundamental principles, is a juror obliged to give his verdict generally, according to this direction, or even to find the fact specially, and sub-mit the law to the court?

John Adams,
"The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States,"

John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, agreed with this veto-like power of the jury. 

In his first trial in 1794 (Georgia vs. Brailsford) he stated: "You had nevertheless a right to take upon yourselves to judge both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy."

When you set on a jury you have the power to make null and void any statute, law or ordinance you feel is unjust. It is Your Duty!

Every man, of any feeling or conscience, will answer, "No."

It is not only his right, but his duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court. 

quoted in Sparf v United States, 156 US 51, 143-44.

In fact, judging the moral intent and the constitutionality of the law

A Jury may acquit anyone on Trial for any law, fact of of the case or reason they feel ius unjust, according to their own conscience. 

This 2nd Revolution Game Changer Can Reverse Tyrannical Legislation Quicker Than The Sociopathic Tyrant Can Enact It.  

This is Called Jury Nullification! 

The Individual Citizen's Oath, Duty and Responsibility To His Kinsmen across the land is understanding & sharing this legislative right, 
without fear of the little "g" god called government 
that is occupied by your enemy the jew. 

To Learn, Inform Family & Neighbors and To Fully Understand 
Their Jury Nullification Duties!

The Atorney's, Judges and Their British Bar Associations that operate the private for profit incorporated Courtroom, Penal System Rackets. 

The Preachers, Media and Teachers who are paid to keep us informed have done all of Humanity a Major Dis-Service, 
InJustice or Subversive, Treasonous Act. 

Useful Idiots in service for satans esau/edomite seedline on the earth today (weather they know or not is their responsibility to study so they may show themselves approved). A.K.A the jew. 

Don't Remain Ignorant of Your Responsibility.

Take Action Today!

If a jew's mouth is moving, they are lying.

The family at the top of the jewish mafiosos (are not italians, real mobsters are of esau/ edom (jews) fled to crete, sicily and spain when Titus Evicted all of the jewish parasites from his realm in 70 AD) pyramid of international crime, terrorism, drug cartels, slavery, satanic rituals, arms dealers, witchcraft, murder and the largest blackmailing, subversive, racketeering scheme ever imagined. 

With black magic, pharmakeia and their control of the purse, the jew with their father the devil have deceived, fooled, bamboozled all of the world into believing in the opposite of what is 
Natural, True and Righteous. 


Anna Von Reitz:  The Constitution of The USA and 
The British Government.

 Lysander Spooner, An Essay on the Trial by Jury,Spooner, An Essay on the Trial by Jury, 1852, p. 11. 

The Honorable William Gordon (12/20/2014)
Congressional Record, House, Page 640 - 1917

The 16th American Jurisprudence Section 177 (16 Am Jur. 2d. Const. Law Sect. 256)

From the 16th American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177:

No comments:

Post a Comment