Monday, January 28, 2019
January 28, 2019
This article drives home the point that
these people do not share same values
and never will. As such, migration
constitutes an insidious attack
on Western culture.
Racist Masonic Jewish central bankers and their proxies Organized Jewry and Freemasonry, are waging a genocidal hate-war against the founding people of the West. Legal immigration that reflects our economic needs and
cultural values and not a pernicious hidden agenda.
"Senegal was not a hellhole. Very poor people can lead happy, meaningful lives in their own cultures' terms. But they are not our terms. The excrement is the least of it. Our basic ideas of human relations, right and wrong, are incompatible."
"I couldn't wait to get home. So why would I want to bring Africa here? Non-Westerners do not magically become American by arriving on our shores with a visa... Leftists want open borders because they resent whites, resent Western achievements, and hate America. They want to destroy America as we know it."
(Jan 17, 2018)
By Karin McQuillan
Three weeks after college, I flew to Senegal, West Africa, to run a community center in a rural town. Life was placid, with no danger, except to your health. That danger was considerable, because it was, in the words of the Peace Corps doctor, "a fecalized environment."
In plain English: s--- is everywhere. People defecate on the open ground, and the feces is blown with the dust - onto you, your clothes, your food, the water. He warned us the first day of training: do not even touch water. Human feces carries parasites that bore through your skin and cause organ failure.
Never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined that a few decades later, liberals would be pushing the lie that Western civilization is no better than a third-world country. Or would teach two generations of our kids that loving your own culture and wanting to preserve it is racism.
Last time I was in Paris, I saw a beautiful African woman in a grand boubou have her child defecate on the sidewalk next to Notre Dame Cathedral. The French police officer, ten steps from her, turned his head not to see.
I have seen. I am not turning my head and pretending unpleasant things are not true.
Senegal was not a hellhole. Very poor people can lead happy, meaningful lives in their own cultures' terms. But they are not our terms. The excrement is the least of it. Our basic ideas of human relations, right and wrong, are incompatible.
As a twenty-one-year-old starting out in the Peace Corps, I loved Senegal. In fact, I was euphoric. I quickly made friends and had an adopted family. I relished the feeling of the brotherhood of man. People were open, willing to share their lives and, after they knew you, their innermost thoughts.
The longer I lived there, the more I understood: it became blindingly obvious that the Senegalese are not the same as us. The truths we hold to be self-evident are not evident to the Senegalese. How could they be? Their reality is totally different. You can't understand anything in Senegal using American terms.
Take something as basic as family. Family was a few hundred people, extending out to second and third cousins. All the men in one generation were called "father." Senegalese are Muslim, with up to four wives. Girls had their clitorises cut off at puberty. (I witnessed this, at what I thought was going to be a nice coming-of-age ceremony, like a bat mitzvah or confirmation.) Sex, I was told, did not include kissing. Love and friendship in marriage were Western ideas. Fidelity was not a thing. Married women would have sex for a few cents to have cash for the market.
What I did witness every day was that women were worked half to death. Wives raised the food and fed their own children, did the heavy labor of walking miles to gather wood for the fire, drew water from the well or public faucet, pounded grain with heavy hand-held pestles, lived in their own huts, and had conjugal visits from their husbands on a rotating basis with their co-wives. Their husbands lazed in the shade of the trees.
Yet family was crucial to people there in a way Americans cannot comprehend.
(left, Karin McQuillan)
The Ten Commandments were not disobeyed - they were unknown. The value system was the exact opposite. You were supposed to steal everything you can to give to your own relatives. There are some Westernized Africans who try to rebel against the system. They fail.
We hear a lot about the kleptocratic elites of Africa. The kleptocracy extends through the whole society. My town had a medical clinic donated by international agencies. The medicine was stolen by the medical workers and sold to the local store. If you were sick and didn't have money, drop dead. That was normal.
So here in the States, when we discovered that my 98-year-old father's Muslim health aide from Nigeria had stolen his clothes and wasn't bathing him, I wasn't surprised. It was familiar.
In Senegal, corruption ruled, from top to bottom. Go to the post office, and the clerk would name an outrageous price for a stamp. After paying the bribe, you still didn't know it if it would be mailed or thrown out. That was normal.
One of my most vivid memories was from the clinic. One day, as the wait grew hotter in the 110-degree heat, an old woman two feet from the medical aides - who were chatting in the shade of a mango tree instead of working - collapsed to the ground. They turned their heads so as not to see her and kept talking. She lay there in the dirt. Callousness to the sick was normal.
Americans think it is a universal human instinct to do unto others as you would have them do unto you. It's not. It seems natural to us because we live in a Bible-based Judeo-Christian culture.
We think the Protestant work ethic is universal. It's not. My town was full of young men doing nothing. They were waiting for a government job. There was no private enterprise. Private business was not illegal, just impossible, given the nightmare of a third-world bureaucratic kleptocracy. It is also incompatible with Senegalese insistence on taking care of relatives.
All the little stores in Senegal were owned by Mauritanians. If a Senegalese wanted to run a little store, he'd go to another country. The reason? Your friends and relatives would ask you for stuff for free, and you would have to say yes. End of your business. You are not allowed to be a selfish individual and say no to relatives. The result: Everyone has nothing.
The more I worked there and visited government officials doing absolutely nothing, the more I realized that no one in Senegal had the idea that a job means work. A job is something given to you by a relative. It provides a place where you steal everything to give back to your family.
I couldn't wait to get home. So why would I want to bring Africa here? Non-Westerners do not magically become American by arriving on our shores with a visa.
For the rest of my life, I enjoyed the greatest gift of the Peace Corps: I love and treasure America more than ever. I take seriously my responsibility to defend our culture and our country and pass on the American heritage to the next generation.
African problems are made worse by our aid efforts. Senegal is full of smart, capable people. They will eventually solve their own country's problems. They will do it on their terms, not ours. The solution is not to bring Africans here.
We are lectured by Democrats that we must privilege third-world immigration by the hundred million with chain migration. They tell us we must end America as a white, Western, Judeo-Christian, capitalist nation - to prove we are not racist. I don't need to prove a thing. Leftists want open borders because they resent whites, resent Western achievements, and hate America. They want to destroy America as we know it.
As President Trump asked, why would we do that?
We have the right to choose what kind of country to live in. I was happy to donate a year of my life as a young woman to help the poor Senegalese. I am not willing to donate my country.
First comment by Tony B- who sent it. Thanks, Tony
Nice little lesson in real geography, which used to include something about the customs in each nation when I went to grade school which now seems several light years separated from the knowledge of the average American. Now geography is just another taboo subject because it's possible to learn something from it which does not fall into the "politically correct" basket (incorrect for political purposes) and that is simply not allowed in western mis-education.
Since this is about a place in Africa let me give you a little info on Africa, especially south of its central areas, about which you have actually been lied to in your "education."
In school in my day, the common reference to Africa was NOT "the dark continent" it was known as "the EMPTY continent" as huge areas of it were actually empty of human beings. When the Dutch settled what might be loosely called the Transvaal area, it was EMPTY of human life. There was one small black tribe at the very southeastern tip of Africa whose land was not bothered by the Dutch, who were exclusively the first humans in their area. The British, always the traders, never the farmers, (Rothschild influence, I suppose) built towns on the coast, soon servicing inland diamond mines that Cecil Rhodes was already consolidating, but it was when Harry Oppenheimer took over the De Beers diamond mines that population actually expanded. This included the black population WHICH WAS TOTALLY IMPORTED, MOSTLY BY OPPENHEIMER, FROM THE CONGO REGION OF CENTRAL AFRICA, they were the Johnny-come-latelies to South Africa, NOT THE WHITE MAN.
Oppenheimer so misused them that, if they could find a way, they escaped the working prisons which were the diamond mines; those not caught still had their lives. There was no way for them to return to their original home and probably not much desire to. Some found ways to survive, sometimes hired to work for the Boer farmers. Gradually a black population grew.
It is not the Boers who displaced the blacks but the other way around, with the 20th century help of vicious communists and American taxpayer money. And now the blacks, happily pushed on by the western powers, are genociding both the Boer farmers and the South African English in the cities, ever more of whom are living in the open on dumps deprived of any means, any future, not even allowed to escape, the girls being regularly raped and anyone murdered at whim by out of control and absolutely uncivilized blacks.
Now you are aware of some of the bull shit you were handed in college about Africa. Read the eye witness article below about another part of Africa.
Caveat: I'm not prone to dwell on race but I am damned sick of the never-ending lies about WHITE MEN. Those idiots who pursue this nonsense will sure as hell wish we were back if they actually succeed in genociding us because in a short time there will not be a damned thing in operation if the new cult leaders can't get some kind of bribe profit to allow for its fixing. Plus those left will get the rude awakening of talmudic/cabal/satanic absolute rule of "the chosen" because anyone not them is just cattle to be used as they please. Think of the 60 to 80 million humans they slaughtered and/or worked to death in their part century of running the soviet.
The Source of This Article by Henry Makow... Link below...
Islam, by law, was prohibited from US immigration – by The 1952 McCarran Walters ACT
ISLAM was NOT ALLOWED IN USA!
Black Savagery Makes Racial Integration Impossible http://eurofolkradio.com/2017/09/20/black-savagery-makes-racial-integration-impossible/ …
Tuesday, February 6, 2018
Demonizing cholesterol is essential for the sale of
CARDIAC SURGEON/PROFESSOR EMERITUS TELLS THE TRUTH ABOUT THE CHOLESTEROL SCAM AND THE TOXIC EFFECTS OF STATINS.
Modern medicine has developed striking ways to treat coronary heart disease, which feature coronary stents implanted percutaneously and coronary artery bypass grafts performed surgically with the aid of a heart-lung machine. And then there are statins to lower cholesterol.
Some 43 million Americans take statins. In 2010, 11.6 percent of the population took them, 37 million, which includes 19.2 percent of people age 45-64; 39.6 percent of people age 65-74; and 44.3 percent of people age 75 and older.3 Following the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines, an additional 10.2 million Americans without cardiovascular disease have now become candidates for statin therapy. One study concludes that 97 percent of black and white Americans age 66 to 75, including all men in that age group, should take statins.
It is a multibillion-dollar business. Pfizer’s Lipitor went on sale in 1997 and became the best-selling drug in the history of prescription pharmaceuticals before its patent expired in 2011. Sales surpassed $125 billion. AstraZeneca’s Crestor was the top-selling statin in 2013, generating $5.2 billion in revenue that year.
Government and the pharmaceutical industry fund these multimillion-dollar studies expecting correct results, so statin trial researchers employ this particular kind of statistical deception to create the appearance that statins are effective and safe. As one medical school professor puts it, “Anyone who questions cholesterol usually finds his funding cut off.”
Statins do more harm than good. Read more of this post
lipitor, crestor, statins, Pharmaceutical Industry, Pharmakeia, sorcery, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, USA Inc,, lawlessness, fascism, deceptive tactics, clinical trials, falsified studies, falsified statistics, fake data, pseudoscience, demonizing, control funding studies, intimidation, private monopolies, international bankers, internationalism, nationalism, federal reserve, UN, evil in high places, international crime syndicate, impostusters, babylonian talmud, luciferians, fallen angels, hybridized society, medical maffia, legal courts, USC, lawlessness, legal v/s lawful, color of law, fraud, treason, for profit government, private courts, debt money, false pharmaceutical studies, drug trial lies, deceptive statistics, tactics, fake science, false stats, statistics, demonizing, private funding, bankers, internationalism, nationalism, federal reserve, UN, wickedness, high places, border control, Immigration, abortion, legal, lawful, Babylonian, crime syndicate, impostusters, criminal cabal, medical maffia, AMA, FDA, contract law, law of merchants, esau-edom, our adversaries, canaanites, serpent seedline, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Corporate America, USA Inc, lawlessness, government, fascism, unconstitutional, judicial system repealed, administrative courts,
Statins do more harm than good.
New post on AntiCorruption Society:
Demonizing cholesterol is essential for the sale of dangerous statins!
by AL Whitney on WordPress.com
Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
AL Whitney | February 6, 2018 at 7:54 p02 |
Tags: Big Pharma, cholesterol, Dr. Miller, heart disease, statins, toxins |
Categories: Big Pharma, corruption |
Wednesday, January 31, 2018
I just viewed an Excellent Dissertation I had to Share with you discussing The Lawful Laws Placed Within Our Hearts vs. the dragons legality of exploiting & plundering by deception...
How it all Relates to US today as it once did to
Our People of Yesterday...
as Those Who Signed The Declaration Would Discover.
So will this Generation...
The System is Completely Broken & Corrupted Beyond any Politician being able to Fix... It Must Be Replaced... Once It Collapses... Quit Trying To Save Something That is (de facto) illegal, demonic in nature and Actively Works Against The People's (Your) Interests...
By Deception... Thou Shalt Make War... is the Israeli (NOT Israelite) Mossad (of the israeli state) Motto & Method of Deception.
By Flooding All White Christian Republic's with Hybrid-Mamzers & Racial Aliens (NOT jewish-Democracies of Love Your Enemies & Communist-Tolerance) to Plunder, Conquer and Exterminate.
See: Deut. 7 because
The Truth is Self-Evident.
Moving on to; The US Constitution.
There is Nothing New Under The Sun.
“even a blind hog (or Californian Liberal) can find
an acorn once in a while.”
It would appear to the unjaundiced eye that the state of California has found the proverbial acorn and a committee or whatever the people to the left of Marx and Engels in that state call it, have hit upon the idea of secession.
They did though take one giant step back in declaring such a move would require an amendment to our Constitution. We must excuse them for this mental lapse considering most cultural Marxists know little to nothing of history, much less the Constitution.
People who seem to know everything there is to know about how to extricate themselves from a failed marriage do have issues attempting to remove themselves from a government from which they have lost that loving feeling.
Of course, there is no mention of secession in The Constitution for the people of our founding era were well acquainted with the concept having just seceded from Great Britain and the Articles of Confederation.
Perhaps that is why Thomas Jefferson in his First Inaugural Address, being fully cognizant of the ill will his election had created in the New England states with those of the Federalist persuasion,
stated the following:
“If there be any among us who wish to dissolve the Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed, as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.”
Notice, if you will, Jefferson said nothing of raising an army to invade those states or killing hundreds of thousands of folks to prevent secession from occurring.
One can be reasonably sure that the newly elected President Jefferson was also aware of the document his home state of Virginia had signed when they had ratified the Constitution in the summer of 1788.
That document read in part,
“… the powers granted under the Constitution.” being derived from the People of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression…”
Ironic as it may seem, New York and Rhode Island placed similar
statements in their ratification agreements.
Considering Article IV Section II para I of our Constitution states,
“The citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states” all states have the right to secede, even Californians.
The leader of the New England secessionists was Timothy Pickering of Massachusetts, who had served as George Washington’s chief of staff, his secretary of war and secretary of state, as well as a congressman and senator from Massachusetts.
“The principles of our Revolution [of 1776] point to
the remedy – a separation,”
Pickering wrote to George Cabot in 1803, for “the people of The East cannot reconcile their habits, views, and interests with those of the South and West.”
“The Eastern states must and will dissolve the Union and form a separate government,” announced Senator James Hillhouse.
Similar sentiments were expressed at the time by such prominent New Englanders as Elbridge Gerry, John Quincy Adams, Fisher Ames, Josiah Quincy, and Joseph Story, among others.
The New England secession movement gained momentum for an entire decade but ultimately was abandoned at the Hartford Secession Convention when the war of 1812 ended.
Throughout this struggle, wrote historian Edward Powell in Nullification and Secession in the United States,
“the right of a state to withdraw from the Union was not disputed.”
Now, one might ask themselves how Abraham Lincoln
managed to get the whole thing
so wrong in 1861?
This is a most relevant question considering Lincoln stated
the following in 1848;
“Any people whatsoever have the right to abolish the existing government and form a new one that suits them better.
This is a most valuable, a most sacred right.”
Lincoln biographers and idolaters never seem to get around to
quoting this particular speech.
Of course, in 1848, Lincoln was not bound to the industrialists of the North who had profited greatly from the institution of slavery* and their economically debilitating confiscatory tariff.
Funny how the passion for other people’s money changes things
in the eyes of a politician.
Ironically, even one of the abolitionists agreed with the Southern states when it came to secession. On December 17, 1860, abolitionist Horace Greeley wrote,
“if tyranny and despotism
justified the American Revolution
then we do not see why
it would not justify the secession
Five Millions of Southrons from the Federal Union in 1861″**
Then again in February of 1861 Greeley wrote, “Nine out of ten people of the North, were opposed to forcing South Carolina to remain in the Union, for the great principle embodied by
Jefferson in the Declaration . . .
is that governments derive their just power from
the consent of the governed.
Therefore, if the southern states wanted to secede,
they have a clear right to do so.”
Similar statements were made by newspapers all throughout the North on the eve of the war, and are perhaps best represented by an editorial in the Kenosha, Wisconsin Democrat, which on January 11, 1861, wrote that “Secession is “the very germ of liberty” and declared “the right of secession inheres to the people of every sovereign state.”
“If military force is used,”
the Bangor Daily Union wrote on
November 13, 1860;
“then a state can only be seen as a subject province and can never be a co-equal member of the American union.”
Most of the top military commanders in the war (on both sides) were educated at West Point, where the one course on the U.S. Constitution was taught by the Philadelphia abolitionist William Rawle, who taught from his book,
A View of the Constitution:
is what Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, and others were taught about secession at West Point was that to deny a state the right of secession “would be inconsistent with the principle on which all our political systems are founded, which is, that the people have in all cases, a right to determine how they will be governed.”
Lincoln never attended West Point, but he supported secession when it served his political plans.
He warmly embraced the secession of West Virginia from Virginia, which was a violation of our Constitution***
and was glad to permit slavery in West Virginia (and all other
“border states”) as long as they supported him politically.
If, as was true in Missouri, the government did not support him, Lincoln simply invaded that state militarily and replaced the legislature,
an act of Treason.****
After the war, Jefferson Davis was imprisoned in the harshest of conditions but was never tried for treason, and for good reason:
The federal government knew that it had no constitutional case against secession, as Charles Adams described in his brilliant book, When in the Course of Human Events.
After his release from prison, Jefferson Davis wrote what would have been his legal defense of secession in the form of a two-volume book, The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government.
The centralization of governmental power not only leads to the looting and plundering of the taxpaying class by the parasitic class; it also slowly destroys freedom of speech and the free exchange of ideas.
One of the first things every tyrannical government does is to monopolize the educational system in order to brainwash the young
and bolster its political power.
As soon as Lee surrendered at Appomattox, the federal government began revising history to teach that secession was illegitimate.
This was all a part of Lincoln’s “revolution” which overthrew the federal system of government created by the founding fathers and put into motion the forces of centralized governmental power.
Peaceful secession and nullification are the only means of returning to a system of government that respects rather than
destroys individual liberty.
As Frank Chodorov wrote in 1952:
“If for no other reason, personal pride should prompt every governor and state legislator to take a secessionist attitude; they were not elected to be lackeys of the federal bureaucracy.”
Of course, California does not mind being the lackey of Hillary Clinton, it is Donald Trump they object to leading that federal bureaucracy.
So, it does appear that the blind hog which is the Marxist state of California has indeed stumbled upon an acorn.
We shall see if they have the mental acuity and foresight to eat it.
IN RIGHTFUL REBEL LIBERTY
* Complicity: How the North Promoted, Prolonged, and
Profited from Slavery.
** New York Daily Tribune
*** Article IV Section III
**** Article III Section III
SECOND VERSE SAME AS THE FIRST
“The value of history is, indeed, not scientific but moral: by liberalizing the mind, by deepening the sympathies, by fortifying the will, it enables us to control, not society, but ourselves — a much more important thing; it prepares us to live more humanely in the present and
to meet rather than to foretell the future.”
~ Carl Becker, 1873-1945
If a person or a political entities goal is to create a strong centralized government which operates basically as an oligarchy,
it will become necessary to disguise those intentions.
The best disguise for an oligarchy is
to clothe that form of government
with the costume of a democracy.
But, to have the masses believe they are involved in their own governance, any comprehensive study of history must be
perverted or abandoned altogether.
For any government to transform from a government operating with the consent of the governed to a tyrannical and oppressive government directed and controlled by the powerful few, two elements must be created and
developed within the governed populace.
These elements, though different in composition, must be
complementary in nature.
First, a tyrannical government needs a totally compliant majority within the masses who, no matter what atrocities the government commits, will be rationalized away much as a battered wife defends and denies
the acts of an abusive spouse.
The oppressive government can take a majority of what these people earn and give it to others who refuse to work; shoot unarmed mothers in the face; shoot 14-year-old sons in the back; incinerate young children and adults in their church and lie about it; provide explosives to so-called terrorists which were subsequently used to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993:
withhold evidence in the investigation of an assassinated president, a civil rights leader, two presidential candidates; evidence in the case of TWA-800;
withhold evidence in the OKC bombing;
constantly monitor all forms of communication involving its citizens without the whisper of probable cause and other various assortments of violations of our Constitution and Bill of Rights while the country’s borders are wide open,
offering unfettered access to our families by the relatives of those whose countries we have invaded immorally and unconstitutionally, killing hundreds of thousands in the process.
While the above indictments of our government’s tyrannical actions barely scratch the surface of what has taken place in the past few decades, the paradoxical actions of the masses defies all logic.
A majority will question domestic actions of their government which destroys the concept of consent of the governed, yet overwhelmingly support that same government when it lies for justification to go to war.
Somehow a government that steals your money destroys your God-given rights and refuses to protect the states from invasion must be totally supported when it prevaricates about the reasons for putting our sons, daughters, mothers and fathers in harm’s way when they illegally and immorally occupy the country of others and kill any who resist.
Government’s very existence requires those who blindly follow the dictates of that government to be perceived and celebrated as heroes to the ignorant but compliant masses.
Then, of course, there is the second element that guarantees a despotic government continued support and blind allegiance to its agenda.
This is the enforcement arm of that government which usually takes the form of a standing army— something our founders feared more than foreign invaders and the police at all levels.
When a government steps outside its legal mandates it must possess the ability to rule by force instead of consent.
Laws formulated to destroy rather than protect the Natural Law and concomitant restrictions on those who govern requires the threat of violence and coercion while Natural/Common Law is accepted by most and does not require the standing armies and militarized police forces of today.
To gain broad acceptance among the historically ignorant, members of the enforcement arm of the government must be viewed as “heroes” for their dedication to protecting the freedoms of the masses.
The fact the very opposite is occurring;
the government is being protected by this enforcement arm and not the people’s rights is lost on the idolaters of unrestrained power, willing dupes and the historically challenged.
Would there ever have been an America if folks like Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, George Washington, Ben Franklin, John Hancock, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and others;
would have decided to “support the troops” instead of demanding their God-given rights from a government acting not at all unlike
the one we have now?
Would they have supported the forces and called them heroes that shot down a child and several others at what we refer to as the Boston Massacre because the enforcers were “just doing their jobs” or would we justify the killings because the government’s enforcers thought the mob was armed and didn’t show their hands-on command?
A study of history reveals that somehow the government of the few can “rally the masses” to their agenda as they go about mass murder, private property destruction and genocide against those with the audacity to challenge their actions.
Statements throughout history reveal a basic theme of demonization of many who just want to be left alone or as the Declaration of Independence states
Statements throughout history reveal a basic theme of demonization of many who just want to be left alone or as the Declaration of Independence states
“assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God entitle them.”
I can assure you the enforcement arm of our present government will be unleashed on any individual or group that attempts to assume
“their separate and equal station”
just as they have on many occasions in our country’s history.
Let’s look at the similarity of the words of those deployed against those who just wanted to be left alone to determine their own destiny instead of kowtowing to tyrannical rule. Of course, all the government’s assets, including a bought and paid for media must be employed to demonize those who would resist the will of the government aggressor.
From our Second War for Independence, known to the great unwashed as the Civil War:
“Extermination, not of soldiers alone, that is the least part of the trouble, but the [Southern] people.” (This continues to this day.)
“To the petulant and persistent secessionists, why death is mercy, and the quicker he or she is disposed of the better . . . . Until we can repopulate Georgia, it is useless to occupy it, but the utter destruction of its roads, houses, and people will cripple their military resources”
“Government of the United States” has the “right” to “take their lives, their homes, their lands, their everything . . . . We will take every life, every acre of land, every particle of property . . .”
(can you see here the possible origins of thought of those who now populate and wear the uniform of the BLM, Oregon State Police, FBI, and USFS?)
“…the war will soon assume a turn to extermination not of soldiers alone, that is the least part of the trouble, but the people . . . .
There is a class of people, men, women, and children, who must be killed…” Union General William Tecumseh Sherman
Sherman’s wife Ellen wrote of her wish for a war “of extermination and that all [Southerners] would be driven like the Swine into the sea.”
Then this same philosophy was turned on the American Indian who stood in the way of “progress.”
Well not progress so much as lining the pockets of the
controllers of the oligarchy.
Time spent studying the book “Hear that Lonesome Whistle Blow” by Dee Brown will illuminate your path to the history in that regard.
“It is my purpose to utterly exterminate the Sioux. They are to be treated as maniacs or wild beasts, and by no means as people with whom treaties or compromise can be made.” ~ Union General John Pope, 1862
“We must act with vindictive earnestness against the Sioux, even to the extermination, men, women, and children” ~ Union General
William Tecumseh Sherman
“The more Indians we can kill this year, the less must be killed next year,” Union General Sherman to Union General Sheridan.
Now, let us look at our government’s current villain de jour:
“You go wherever in the world the terrorists are and you kill them, you do your best to exterminate them, and then you leave, and you leave behind smoking ruins and crying widows.” ~ Lt. Colonel Peters on FOX News
How Shermanesque of the good Colonel? Would he object to those he seeks to exterminate having the same thoughts about him and his family?
Are these “terrorists” he speaks of his personal enemies or just the current enemy of the government he blindly supports?
Perhaps he believes taking away all our freedoms at home would prevent future attacks perpetrated against us “because we are free.”
“We need to kill them. We need to kill them, the radical Muslim terrorists hell-bent on killing us. You’re in danger. I’m in danger. We’re at war and this is not going to stop.” ~FOX News’ Jeanine Pirro
“Well, I’m no theologian, but I suspect Jesus would tell that god-fearing, red-blooded American Sniper, ‘well done, my good and faithful servant, for dispatching another godless jihadist to the lake of fire.’ But then again, I’m no theologian.” FOX News’ Todd Starnes
Does anyone see a pattern here?
How very convenient is historical amnesia or just historical ignorance when it comes to supporting the enforcement arm of our tyrannical and oppressive government as it goes about its daily task of robbing the people, destroying their rights and property and by threat, coercion, or willful ignorance demanding allegiance thereto?
Would Colonel Peters, Ms. Pirro or Mr. Starnes dare comment on the fact our government has provided billions of our tax dollars to these “Muslim terrorists” and “godless jihadists” for decades
and continues to do so even now?
We could begin with the 500 million provided to these forces back in 1978 by the CIA, the funding for ISIS and al Qaeda, or the fact we supported these very same forces in Kosovo.
Has FOX News forgotten their own reporter spoke with Senator John McCain on his support for arming ISIS in 2013?
Have they forgotten McCain’s proud moment displaying his picture made with these “terrorists” (Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and Muhammad Noor) on his “secret trip” to visit and support them (ISIS) on Memorial Day in 2013?
Ignorance of history and moral decay is destroying our country.
How convenient is it to forget that our country provided
funding to Stalin, Pol Pot and Mao?
How many millions of innocent lives are these three responsible for?
Did our dollars contribute in any way to their wanton acts of genocide?
Did our dollars buy the guns or the bullets?
This continued ignorance and blind patriotism directed toward the enforcement arm of our tyrannical government serves only to accelerate our loss of Liberty and eventual enslavement:
spiritual, mental, economical and physical.
It might be time to look backward to better understand moving forward.
IN RIGHTFUL REBEL LIBERTY