Diversity is White Genocide by Satan's Khazarian, Esau/Edomites = The Yehudi = The Jew's!: Continued Ignorance and Blind Patriotism

I just viewed an Excellent Dissertation I had to Share with you discussing The Lawful Laws Placed Within Our Hearts vs. the dragons legality of exploiting & plundering by deception...

How it all Relates to US today as it once did to

Our People of Yesterday...

as Those Who Signed The Declaration Would Discover.

So will this Generation...

The System is Completely Broken & Corrupted Beyond any Politician being able to Fix... It Must Be Replaced... Once It Collapses... Quit Trying To Save Something That is (de facto) illegal, demonic in nature and Actively Works Against The People's (Your) Interests...

By Deception... Thou Shalt Make War... is the Israeli (NOT Israelite's) Mossad (of the israeli state) Motto & Method of Deception.

By Flooding All White Christian Republic's with Hybrid-Mamzers & Racial Aliens (NOT jewish-Democracies of Love Your Enemies & Communist-Tolerance) to Plunder, Conquer and Exterminate.

See: Deut. 7 because

The Truth is Self-Evident.

Moving on to; The US Constitution.

There is Nothing New Under The Sun.

“even a blind hog (or Californian Liberal) can find

an acorn once in a while.”

It would appear to the unjaundiced eye that the state of California has found the proverbial acorn and a committee or whatever the people to the left of Marx and Engels in that state call it, have hit upon the idea of secession.

They did though take one giant step back in declaring such a move would require an amendment to our Constitution. We must excuse them for this mental lapse considering most cultural Marxists know little to nothing of history, much less the Constitution.

People who seem to know everything there is to know about how to extricate themselves from a failed marriage do have issues attempting to remove themselves from a government from which they have lost that loving feeling.

Of course, there is no mention of secession in The Constitution for the people of our founding era were well acquainted with the concept having just seceded from Great Britain and the Articles of Confederation.

Perhaps that is why Thomas Jefferson in his First Inaugural Address, being fully cognizant of the ill will his election had created in the New England states with those of the Federalist persuasion,

stated the following:

“If there be any among us who wish to dissolve the Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed, as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.”

Notice, if you will, Jefferson said nothing of raising an army to invade those states or killing hundreds of thousands of folks to prevent secession from occurring.

One can be reasonably sure that the newly elected President Jefferson was also aware of the document his home state of Virginia had signed when they had ratified the Constitution in the summer of 1788.

That document read in part,

“… the powers granted under the Constitution.” being derived from the People of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression…”

Ironic as it may seem, New York and Rhode Island placed similar

statements in their ratification agreements.

Considering Article IV Section II para I of our Constitution states,

“The citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states” all states have the right to secede, even Californians.

The leader of the New England secessionists was Timothy Pickering of Massachusetts, who had served as George Washington’s chief of staff, his secretary of war and secretary of state, as well as a congressman and senator from Massachusetts.

“The principles of our Revolution [of 1776] point to

the remedy – a separation,”

Pickering wrote to George Cabot in 1803, for “the people of The East cannot reconcile their habits, views, and interests with those of the South and West.”

“The Eastern states must and will dissolve the Union and form a separate government,” announced Senator James Hillhouse.

Similar sentiments were expressed at the time by such prominent New Englanders as Elbridge Gerry, John Quincy Adams, Fisher Ames, Josiah Quincy, and Joseph Story, among others.

The New England secession movement gained momentum for an entire decade but ultimately was abandoned at the Hartford Secession Convention when the war of 1812 ended.

Throughout this struggle, wrote historian Edward Powell in Nullification and Secession in the United States,

“the right of a state to withdraw from the Union was not disputed.”

Now, one might ask themselves how Abraham Lincoln

managed to get the whole thing

so wrong in 1861?

This is a most relevant question considering Lincoln stated

the following in 1848;

“Any people whatsoever have the right to abolish the existing government and form a new one that suits them better.

This is a most valuable, a most sacred right.”

Lincoln biographers and idolaters never seem to get around to

quoting this particular speech.

Of course, in 1848, Lincoln was not bound to the industrialists of the North who had profited greatly from the institution of slavery* and their economically debilitating confiscatory tariff.

Funny how the passion for other people’s money changes things

in the eyes of a politician.

Ironically, even one of the abolitionists agreed with the Southern states when it came to secession. On December 17, 1860, abolitionist Horace Greeley wrote,

“if tyranny and despotism

justified the American Revolution

of 1776,

then we do not see why

it would not justify the secession

Five Millions of Southrons from the Federal Union in 1861″**

Then again in February of 1861 Greeley wrote, “Nine out of ten people of the North, were opposed to forcing South Carolina to remain in the Union, for the great principle embodied by

Jefferson in the Declaration . . .

is that governments derive their just power from

the consent of the governed.

Therefore, if the southern states wanted to secede,

they have a clear right to do so.”

Similar statements were made by newspapers all throughout the North on the eve of the war, and are perhaps best represented by an editorial in the Kenosha, Wisconsin Democrat, which on January 11, 1861, wrote that “Secession is “the very germ of liberty” and declared “the right of secession inheres to the people of every sovereign state.”

“If military force is used,”

the Bangor Daily Union wrote on

November 13, 1860;

“then a state can only be seen as a subject province and can never be a co-equal member of the American union.”

Most of the top military commanders in the war (on both sides) were educated at West Point, where the one course on the U.S. Constitution was taught by the Philadelphia abolitionist William Rawle, who taught from his book,

A View of the Constitution:

is what Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, and others were taught about secession at West Point was that to deny a state the right of secession “would be inconsistent with the principle on which all our political systems are founded, which is, that the people have in all cases, a right to determine how they will be governed.”

Lincoln never attended West Point, but he supported secession when it served his political plans.

He warmly embraced the secession of West Virginia from Virginia, which was a violation of our Constitution***

and was glad to permit slavery in West Virginia (and all other

“border states”) as long as they supported him politically.

If, as was true in Missouri, the government did not support him, Lincoln simply invaded that state militarily and replaced the legislature,

an act of Treason.****

After the war, Jefferson Davis was imprisoned in the harshest of conditions but was never tried for treason, and for good reason:

The federal government knew that it had no constitutional case against secession, as Charles Adams described in his brilliant book, When in the Course of Human Events.

After his release from prison, Jefferson Davis wrote what would have been his legal defense of secession in the form of a two-volume book, The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government.

The centralization of governmental power not only leads to the looting and plundering of the taxpaying class by the parasitic class; it also slowly destroys freedom of speech and the free exchange of ideas.

One of the first things every tyrannical government does is to monopolize the educational system in order to brainwash the young

and bolster its political power.

As soon as Lee surrendered at Appomattox, the federal government began revising history to teach that secession was illegitimate.

This was all a part of Lincoln’s “revolution” which overthrew the federal system of government created by the founding fathers and put into motion the forces of centralized governmental power.

Peaceful secession and nullification are the only means of returning to a system of government that respects rather than

destroys individual liberty.

As Frank Chodorov wrote in 1952:

“If for no other reason, personal pride should prompt every governor and state legislator to take a secessionist attitude; they were not elected to be lackeys of the federal bureaucracy.”

Of course, California does not mind being the lackey of Hillary Clinton, it is Donald Trump they object to leading that federal bureaucracy.

So, it does appear that the blind hog which is the Marxist state of California has indeed stumbled upon an acorn.

We shall see if they have the mental acuity and foresight to eat it.

IN RIGHTFUL REBEL LIBERTY

* Complicity: How the North Promoted, Prolonged, and

Profited from Slavery.

** New York Daily Tribune

*** Article IV Section III

**** Article III Section III

SECOND VERSE SAME AS THE FIRST

“The value of history is, indeed, not scientific but moral: by liberalizing the mind, by deepening the sympathies, by fortifying the will, it enables us to control, not society, but ourselves — a much more important thing; it prepares us to live more humanely in the present and

to meet rather than to foretell the future.”

~ Carl Becker, 1873-1945

If a person or a political entities goal is to create a strong centralized government which operates basically as an oligarchy,

it will become necessary to disguise those intentions.

The best disguise for an oligarchy is

to clothe that form of government

with the costume of a democracy.

But, to have the masses believe they are involved in their own governance, any comprehensive study of history must be

perverted or abandoned altogether.

For any government to transform from a government operating with the consent of the governed to a tyrannical and oppressive government directed and controlled by the powerful few, two elements must be created and

developed within the governed populace.

These elements, though different in composition, must be

complementary in nature.

First, a tyrannical government needs a totally compliant majority within the masses who, no matter what atrocities the government commits, will be rationalized away much as a battered wife defends and denies

the acts of an abusive spouse.

The oppressive government can take a majority of what these people earn and give it to others who refuse to work; shoot unarmed mothers in the face; shoot 14-year-old sons in the back; incinerate young children and adults in their church and lie about it; provide explosives to so-called terrorists which were subsequently used to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993:

withhold evidence in the investigation of an assassinated president, a civil rights leader, two presidential candidates; evidence in the case of TWA-800;

withhold evidence in the OKC bombing;

constantly monitor all forms of communication involving its citizens without the whisper of probable cause and other various assortments of violations of our Constitution and Bill of Rights while the country’s borders are wide open,

offering unfettered access to our families by the relatives of those whose countries we have invaded immorally and unconstitutionally, killing hundreds of thousands in the process.

While the above indictments of our government’s tyrannical actions barely scratch the surface of what has taken place in the past few decades, the paradoxical actions of the masses defies all logic.

A majority will question domestic actions of their government which destroys the concept of consent of the governed, yet overwhelmingly support that same government when it lies for justification to go to war.

Somehow a government that steals your money destroys your God-given rights and refuses to protect the states from invasion must be totally supported when it prevaricates about the reasons for putting our sons, daughters, mothers and fathers in harm’s way when they illegally and immorally occupy the country of others and kill any who resist.

Government’s very existence requires those who blindly follow the dictates of that government to be perceived and celebrated as heroes to the ignorant but compliant masses.

Then, of course, there is the second element that guarantees a despotic government continued support and blind allegiance to its agenda.

This is the enforcement arm of that government which usually takes the form of a standing army— something our founders feared more than foreign invaders and the police at all levels.

When a government steps outside its legal mandates it must possess the ability to rule by force instead of consent.

Laws formulated to destroy rather than protect the Natural Law and concomitant restrictions on those who govern requires the threat of violence and coercion while Natural/Common Law is accepted by most and does not require the standing armies and militarized police forces of today.

To gain broad acceptance among the historically ignorant, members of the enforcement arm of the government must be viewed as “heroes” for their dedication to protecting the freedoms of the masses.

The fact the very opposite is occurring;

the government is being protected by this enforcement arm and not the people’s rights is lost on the idolaters of unrestrained power, willing dupes and the historically challenged.

Would there ever have been an America if folks like Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, George Washington, Ben Franklin, John Hancock, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and others;

would have decided to “support the troops” instead of demanding their God-given rights from a government acting not at all unlike

the one we have now?

Would they have supported the forces and called them heroes that shot down a child and several others at what we refer to as the Boston Massacre because the enforcers were “just doing their jobs” or would we justify the killings because the government’s enforcers thought the mob was armed and didn’t show their hands-on command?

A study of history reveals that somehow the government of the few can “rally the masses” to their agenda as they go about mass murder, private property destruction and genocide against those with the audacity to challenge their actions.

Statements throughout history reveal a basic theme of demonization of many who just want to be left alone or as the Declaration of Independence states

“assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God entitle them.”

I can assure you the enforcement arm of our present government will be unleashed on any individual or group that attempts to assume

“their separate and equal station”

just as they have on many occasions in our country’s history.

Let’s look at the similarity of the words of those deployed against those who just wanted to be left alone to determine their own destiny instead of kowtowing to tyrannical rule. Of course, all the government’s assets, including a bought and paid for media must be employed to demonize those who would resist the will of the government aggressor.

From our Second War for Independence, known to the great unwashed as the Civil War:

“Extermination, not of soldiers alone, that is the least part of the trouble, but the [Southern] people.” (This continues to this day.)

“To the petulant and persistent secessionists, why death is mercy, and the quicker he or she is disposed of the better . . . . Until we can repopulate Georgia, it is useless to occupy it, but the utter destruction of its roads, houses, and people will cripple their military resources”

“Government of the United States” has the “right” to “take their lives, their homes, their lands, their everything . . . . We will take every life, every acre of land, every particle of property . . .”

(can you see here the possible origins of thought of those who now populate and wear the uniform of the BLM, Oregon State Police, FBI, and USFS?)

“…the war will soon assume a turn to extermination not of soldiers alone, that is the least part of the trouble, but the people . . . .

There is a class of people, men, women, and children, who must be killed…” Union General William Tecumseh Sherman

Sherman’s wife Ellen wrote of her wish for a war “of extermination and that all [Southerners] would be driven like the Swine into the sea.”

Then this same philosophy was turned on the American Indian who stood in the way of “progress.”

Well not progress so much as lining the pockets of the

controllers of the oligarchy.

Time spent studying the book “Hear that Lonesome Whistle Blow” by Dee Brown will illuminate your path to the history in that regard.

“It is my purpose to utterly exterminate the Sioux. They are to be treated as maniacs or wild beasts, and by no means as people with whom treaties or compromise can be made.” ~ Union General John Pope, 1862

“We must act with vindictive earnestness against the Sioux, even to the extermination, men, women, and children” ~ Union General

William Tecumseh Sherman

“The more Indians we can kill this year, the less must be killed next year,” Union General Sherman to Union General Sheridan.

Now, let us look at our government’s current villain de jour:

Muslim extremists.

“You go wherever in the world the terrorists are and you kill them, you do your best to exterminate them, and then you leave, and you leave behind smoking ruins and crying widows.” ~ Lt. Colonel Peters on FOX News

How Shermanesque of the good Colonel? Would he object to those he seeks to exterminate having the same thoughts about him and his family?

Are these “terrorists” he speaks of his personal enemies or just the current enemy of the government he blindly supports?

Perhaps he believes taking away all our freedoms at home would prevent future attacks perpetrated against us “because we are free.”

“We need to kill them. We need to kill them, the radical Muslim terrorists hell-bent on killing us. You’re in danger. I’m in danger. We’re at war and this is not going to stop.” ~FOX News’ Jeanine Pirro

“Well, I’m no theologian, but I suspect Jesus would tell that god-fearing, red-blooded American Sniper, ‘well done, my good and faithful servant, for dispatching another godless jihadist to the lake of fire.’ But then again, I’m no theologian.” FOX News’ Todd Starnes

Does anyone see a pattern here?

How very convenient is historical amnesia or just historical ignorance when it comes to supporting the enforcement arm of our tyrannical and oppressive government as it goes about its daily task of robbing the people, destroying their rights and property and by threat, coercion, or willful ignorance demanding allegiance thereto?

Would Colonel Peters, Ms. Pirro or Mr. Starnes dare comment on the fact our government has provided billions of our tax dollars to these “Muslim terrorists” and “godless jihadists” for decades

and continues to do so even now?

We could begin with the 500 million provided to these forces back in 1978 by the CIA, the funding for ISIS and al Qaeda, or the fact we supported these very same forces in Kosovo.

Has FOX News forgotten their own reporter spoke with Senator John McCain on his support for arming ISIS in 2013?

Have they forgotten McCain’s proud moment displaying his picture made with these “terrorists” (Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and Muhammad Noor) on his “secret trip” to visit and support them (ISIS) on Memorial Day in 2013?

Ignorance of history and moral decay is destroying our country.

How convenient is it to forget that our country provided

funding to Stalin, Pol Pot and Mao?

How many millions of innocent lives are these three responsible for?

Did our dollars contribute in any way to their wanton acts of genocide?

Did our dollars buy the guns or the bullets?

This continued ignorance and blind patriotism directed toward the enforcement arm of our tyrannical government serves only to accelerate our loss of Liberty and eventual enslavement: